UFO TIC TAC Incident DESCRIBED By First Hand Witness Rt. Commander David Fravor AT UAP Hearing

Former U.S. Navy commander David Fravor describes the ‘tic-tac’ incident: “All four of us saw a white ‘tic-tac' object with a longitudinal axis pointing north-south, and moving very abruptly over the water, like a ping-pong ball.”

[maxfraguas]

The allegations of Mr.Grusch require IMMEDIATE investigation

[fabiosfulcini]

Thank you mr Fravor for what you are doing

[mikeandre]

I watch the hearing. It was astonishing.

[leeroy]

Incredible. Tons of info that hasnt been said publicly. They are risking their lives and careers, and you can tell when the answer is an obvious yes, but the pressure on them is so great they are literally fearful. This is the beginning of the change that the world so desperately needs. The change and technology we need to end poverty and world hunger, everyone will have free energy. Cant wait for the future.

[point-xntu]

Good job presenting, Rt. Commander Fravor! That was a lot to be said in a brief window of time, covering info that the public at large is still oblivious to. Made some really good points. Where is the oversight of the SAPs?!

[HolisticMarz]

You would think they would get the ball rolling today. Let's get this out once and for all. Great work to everyone involved. We can't let the Pentagon outstep the public on this one.

[daryusharash]

What woul amaze me is : what those UFO people think of us. Do they think we are apes?

[Nonyabiz]

After watching your video, I used the link provided to watch the congressional hearing with the whistleblowers. Wow. Really interesting and concerning subject matter! So glad I made myself get through the first 23 minutes of it, as some of the speakers running the hearing were, in my opinion, grating. That said, once the actual whistleblowers were introduced (approximately 23 minutes in), the rest of the hearing was incredibly compelling. I especially enjoyed listening to retired Navy Commander David Fravor, a graduate of the esteemed Top Gun school for fighter pilots, and Naval Aviator for 18 years, share his experience encountering an unidentified arial phenomena (aka UAP, aka a UFO) back in 2004. All three of the men who gave their testimonies left a strong, positive impression of being highly intelligent, honest, and forthright.

It was one of those videos you just want to share with others in order to open people’s minds as to the possibilities of what’s going on “out there” - and *here*.

Thank you, Pdina, for helping to bring this to our attention, and for including the link to the actual hearing.
If anyone starts watching it, only to become frustrated by the rhetoric or the way-off-topic-chatter of some, hang in there. You can fast forward to the witnesses testimonies. After listening to the witnesses testimonies, I was able to listen to the other speakers with more….patience. Definitely, the witnesses SHINE.

Still stand by my earlier comment, which was that UFOs are infinitely more interesting - and more *relevant* - than Nutmeg and The Sock Puppet.

[KoolT]

Just watched. Seems if they were going to do something to us they would have by now.

[stechriswillgil]

I thought Favor was the most convincing. Hes resisted talking about it in the past and was skeptical until others came forward. Now lets wait for the deluge of more whistleblowers now the cat is out of the bag !

[sammoulton]

I met a man who saw this in person. I thought it sounded pretty "out there" while explaining it but I guess this actually happened!

[rasmuslernevall]

Imagine the irony if it actually turned out to be little green men. That could almost become a meme.

[Aeternum_Gaming]

To cover a distance of 60 miles in just 60 seconds, a UFO would need to achieve an astounding speed of 3600 miles per hour, approximately 5 times faster than the speed of sound in air, which is approximately 767 mph. To put this into perspective, the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+, the world's fastest car, can reach a top speed of 304 mph, while the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird, the fastest plane ever built, can achieve a top speed of 2193 mph. It's important to note that the SR-71 typically operates in the upper atmosphere, and attempting to fly at such extreme speeds at lower altitudes with higher air density would be nothing short of astonishing.

[johnnysaid]

I've been hearing this for almost 20 yrs now. i feel humanity is contented with knowing that there is someone out there who can drive faster. ETs, if they are super intelligent (as alleged) and consider us in the category of cats and dogs, would be contented to stop by occasionally to give us a pat on the head

[dav]

Remember when ronald reagen said: i occasionally think how quickly our differences world wide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world 👽

[mxcope]

"ufo community" out in full force here. At least they're drowning out Jessica's simps.

[terrythompson]

Keep up the heat until the kernels start to pop!

[nystagmus]

I’m surprised many ppl are oblivious to this subject until now. They are at least late 5 years (2017).

[Andrew-]

I'd sure like to interview Cmdr. Fravor. I'd like to ask all the questions necessary to fully understand what they saw and did and be able to construct a faithful reenactment of it using a flight simulator such as DCS. The part where it speeds off at incredible speed would have to be otherwise animated as it would be beyond the normal parameters of the simulator.
Everything. What time of day. Weather conditions. Heading, altitude and speed while inbound to the object. At what angle and estimated range was the object first observed and by which of the 4 crew members? And so forth... And then to be able to analyze the tracks of the aircraft and of the object on a map, in an animation, afterwards. As for the ship's radar, can the radar operator estimate the plots (I don't think the radar paints a continuous track but only points as it sweeps the target at regular intervals in its search pattern). So, how many points were plotted of the object as it zipped away from the aircraft and back to the starting point of where the aircraft came from? Was it actually tracked as 'cruising' back to that point, or did it simply reappear on radar at that point 60 seconds later? With the number of objects they claimed to have tracked, how do they know it was the same object?

Another thought: We went from fabric-covered WWI biplanes in 1918 to aluminum-alloy skinned supersonic jets in 1948...30 years. From Mach 1 1948 to landing on the Moon in 1969...20 years. From the F-16 fighter jet in 1976 to the F-35 in 2006...30 years. Why does it seem like our aircraft technology progress slowed so much in the last 30 years after having progressed so rapidly from 1918 to 1969? Or did it slow? Maybe it didn't. And maybe the 'tic-tac' is representative of the real, but hidden, continued progress. Just a thought.

[penabler]

No more government secrets, we need radical transparency going forward.