Classic Car Options ➡️ Good or Bad?

Options, are they GOOD or BAD in a classic car? In this video we discuss why they can be BOTH while evaluating this ‘option loaded’ 1966 Mustang GT convertible.

Our classic car repair shop is located in Roanoke, Texas.

🧰🛠Here's our personally curated Amazon store:
We are participants in the Amazon Influencer program. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Our social media:

[mrfixit]

Been collecting NOS parts for a 66 for years and also NOS option parts. Like the hobby of it.

[robertrudeseal]

I love Mustang's no matter what. When I build one for myself, I like putting modern optional equipment to it for the sheer comfort of driving, and over the years there's always someone out there who wants to buy one when I finish with it. Love your program!

[annettescott]

My dream car is a 67 Mustang GT Coupe. For safety reasons, I will add every modern option I possibly can. I don't want to be stuck on the side of the road overheating. Or heaven forbid an electrical fire happens due to old wiring. And, I know it's going to cost me. But, I'd rather be safe than sorry. 🙏

[jayg]

Like to know some of the dealer extras, like the fold out display sign for the glove box from the dealer that says 'Please Help... Out Of Gas'. etc. Love the car!

[kamaseya]

I have a base GT coupe with an auto and love it. Had it since 1997. I didn't want all the extras.

[FordMustang]

I fully agree that options are the cherry on top. If documented with an original invoice - these can make it a jackpot car. For 1965/66 models, original invoices are sometimes the only way to verify the options; however, it is almost impossible to find such „papers“ after 60 years since the car was sold.
Starting in 1967, the Marti Report clarifies which options were originally equipped on the car. That’s a great thing.
I’m not a big fan of aftermarket accessories unless they enhance driving safety.
I also don’t believe such „new“ accessories add value; besides, isn’t it fun and a pleasure to drive the car the way it was 60 years ago?

[silverfrostmustang]

I've made under the sheet metal improvements for safety and reliability. Also feel safe to add options that were or could have been dealer installed. Not original components of course. All for the enjoyment of driving the car. Car has been in the family since day 1, it should last well past me and the next generation can do with it what they want.

[porschenut]

I have a bare bones ‘66 Shelby replica which I love. My wife has recently alluded to wanting a convertible Mustang - it would be nice contrast to own a fully loaded example such as this.

[markw]

If you are purchasing a car as a collector, then most likely it would be best to keep the car as original as possible. If you’re buying the car of your dreams it makes sense to equip it as you want. I would love to have an early gen 1 or 2 Mustang to drive weekly and I would want dual master cylinder brakes, front discs and air conditioning, plus a few goodies from that time

[DJClassicAuto]

I'm assuming that you know those are '65 wheels. The 66s had those goofy-looking trim rings instead of the chrome. I don't mind upselling the car with options it didn't actually come with, but they should be options that were available in that model year. Just my opinion, though.

[N]

Totally Agreed Michael... My Specific Interest would be a 1968/1969 Torino GT Sportsroof or Formal Roofline albeit not nearly as desirable as The Pony Cars that you Specialize in! (I would settle for a 2008 Bullitt Mustang though) ';-)

[dwilliams]

It’s simple- if you can’t afford a high end restoration don’t do it -get a car you can afford - the last ( and third) restoration on my 1966 GT Fastback that I bought new in April 1966 cost over thirty thousand and it was worth twenty five thousand after. Today it’s worth much more but no one should consider it a investment- be ready to lose your money but have a labor of love

[mmartin]

Hi! Fellow Mustanger here. Nice looking 66 convertible there. While you listed the options, I heard you sneak in "reverse lights". Didn't reverse lights become standard in 1966?

[misterslideways]

Michael, does this car have the 14 X 5.5” styled steel wheels from a ‘67 to accommodate those BFG silvertowns? I’ve heard you need that extra .5” to accommodate those 205 70 radials. I assume that’s what size they are? Any information you can provide is appreciated. I have this same exact interior and exterior color combo on my ‘66 A-Code GT fastback. That wheel and tire combo compliments the Nightmist blue so well, IMO. Thank you!

[jimbutler]

Anyone that can not list there prices of cars you either have to be rich or a fool maybe both

[Craig-fezv]

I would love it's this one beautifully Car FORD MUSTANG GT 66 I would love it's want One this one Car yes please for me My dream

[malibuconv]

Door "cards"?
Just stop.
Those are Door PANELS.
Ifnyou gobto any Restoration site/catalog ut will be listed as Door Panels.
Stop trying to make "cards" happen.