Introduction to the Frobenius Method

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, I introduce the Frobenius Method to solving ODEs and do a short example.

Questions? Ask them below!

Prerequisites: Regular series solutions of ODEs (basically those two series videos I made).

Also, one of the comments pointed out that I made a mistake at 8:45: when you plug r1=1 into the coefficient of the a1 term, you get 3! For r2=0.5 you get 1. Still, that doesn't change the fact that plugging these values of r into the other terms will give us non-zero coefficients for the a1, a2, a3, etc.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

your knowledge of mathematical methods is good; but your sense of humor is the best!

nishadingale
Автор

This is a great video! I appreciate that you explain seemingly simple ideas, just in case students are lost. You're awesome!

lilpandaftw
Автор

this is a family show? yeah, my 8 year old niece is interested in how frobenius differs from bessel

kadekevin
Автор

I really appreciate you taking the time to make that comment at 11:00

Автор

I liked the pace of this video. When I needed to double-check, I simply paused the video -- which is far easier than trying to skip ahead when the pace is too slow.

eamonnsiocain
Автор

This is an amazing explanation.
But for me:
First time I heard it: could not follow or get it at all!
then, I solved a few examples...
then, I listened to this again: Now its the best explanation that I can find anywhere!

EngelUniverse
Автор

Best explanation i have ever seen on this method.

harshmishra
Автор

Well explained.  I could actually follow it, and it's been many years since I've studied this.

jessrevill
Автор

Fantastic video! Much more detail than my math methods book provides.

zackmorelli
Автор

Underrated video. I wish I could like this another thousand times.

jaredjones
Автор

I appreciate your confidence in solving the mathematics problems thank for your action

mahdiaudujanda
Автор

Correct me if i am wrong, but you solved this question with euler's method.

*Basically, if you can't write y in power series form, our point is singular.
*If you can also write down indicial polynomial and solve it, point is regular singular.
*You could put y=x^r and you could get the same solution.To use frobenius, you should've got recurrance relation.

coal
Автор

Great video. After pausing the video and letting my brain catch up with you a couple times, this makes sense now!

ethan
Автор

excellent video! if you can make this intuitive to my sleep-deprived brain then you can teach anything. You cut right to the point and explain just enough background information to understand the process very well. awesome video

JimehC
Автор

Good sir, you are an absolute legend.

snp
Автор

Great videos, I really find your videos more useful than my college profs

akshattiwari
Автор

Don't know if it is the lack of sleep but that family show joke got me good

niel
Автор

not mispronouncing or misspelling Fuch's Theorem because "it's a family show" lmao
anyone spending quality time with their family watching this video is a maniac and the situation should be investigated.
Anyways, great vid, I love the explanation and the bits of humor, youre helping make this degree marginally less painful!

Bubbletwist
Автор

Learning how to solve series solutions about a regular point was is an extra credit assignment because it wasn't covered in my class. Thank you this was helpful. However, one difference btwn SS-OP and SS-RP that I couldn't explain was when we took the derivatives of the respective series substitutions (i.e. y= sum(n=o)cnx...). Why did n increase in SS-OP but stay 0 in SS-RP?

Example:
SS-OP
y= Sum(n=0)...
y'= Sum(n=1)...
y''= Sum(n=2)...

SS-RP
y= Sum(n=0)...
y'= Sum(n=0)...
y''= Sum(n=0)...

sharkdavid
Автор

Hi Khan! Great vid. thanks so much. One question, when you said "the radius of convergence for the power series is at least 1" at 2:38, don't you mean "at most 1"?

jacobsnoises