Ural-Altaic hypothesis? #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

A Finnish chap who became, I believe, the first and ONLY white European to serve in the Japanese Diet ( which is even MORE mono - racial / mono - ethnic than the broader society itself ) was a Finn, and, I recall him mentioning how much more approachable Japanese is for Finns to grasp than for, say, English or German speakers.

Albert-Arthur-Wison
Автор

I am swedish and I have always thought that finish people sound kinda japanese when they speak and that japanese sound kinda finnish.

beacurnearecurvata
Автор

Well according to history, Turkic people and Mongolians are definetly related especially in the early states like Xiongnu. Koreans also do have slight nomadic early traits from the same place as Turks and Mongols. Japanese weren’t really nomadic, but they are related to Koreans. (Also Tengrism was also an influence in the Korean reigon).

dendencars
Автор

btw Finland and Korea more related to each other than Iceland and India

khanate
Автор

Makes sense. Still like those languages. Turkic, Japanese, Finnish, all cool stuff.

ChadKakashi
Автор

Turkic and Mongolian are related, Korean and Japanese are related, but they are not all related with eachother

StanbyMode
Автор

No, Japanese belongs to Japonic language, not Altaic.

salade
Автор

I couldn't find the original short video on Finnish on TikTok, but Finnish for sure is not a SOV order language. 🙂

AnttiKivivalli
Автор

You really know your stuff. Linguistics is such a vast corpus/discipline that of course we can't learn it all. We have similar interests. But you have properly trained yourself for explaining an Introductory for mere human anglophones. **applause** for an effort that that can be so called.

JeanNeuenfeldt
Автор

I think Turkic branch is a bridge between Uralic branch and Mongolic-japonic branch.

nurettinsarul
Автор

Whats more logical than that? When it comes to indo European or proto indo European you always come up with a connection, even though there is a slight possibility that even the structure is the same, but a stronger evidence is in ural altaic that whatever vocabulary u use, the structure is the same… so structure prevails vocabulary, the words and people in the region that effected each other or were related come later…

nukhetyavuz
Автор

One of my grandfather from Altay Region

AbayIskakOfficial
Автор

Visegrad languages, Czech, Slovak, Polish, Hungarian etc., ..

KingsleyAmuzu
Автор

I think they are related. I strongly doubt they influenced each other to that extent.

mergencytype
Автор

finnish is definitely uralic but japanese or korean being related to altaic is conjecture.

rabbiswit
Автор

what do the numbers with the slashes in the text mean

matt
Автор

And there is an idea that uralic is related to indo European

thetornadocrusader
Автор

I don't know what any of these words mean but I like your funny words magic man.

ExistentiallyDreading
Автор

no, just because they have sov (which i dont know what your talking about i speak finnish and hungarian and neither of them have good sov) doesn't mean they are related. Uralic languages may be sparsly related to northern Altaic langauges but finnish and japanese aren't related.

jallil
Автор

I am pro-altaic fan. But I still feel not sure uralic is the same as the

Hampter-mr