Does Classical Theism Secure Monotheism? - Christopher Tomaszewski & Joe Schmid

preview_player
Показать описание


The purpose of Intellectual Conservatism is to defend the true, good and beautiful things of life that are jeopardized in mainstream academia and society. On this page, you will find artwork, music, satire, academic papers, lectures and my own projects defending the duty of conserving these true, good and beautiful things.
  1. Intellectual Catholicism
  2. Edward Feser
  3. Ryan Mullins
  4. Majesty of Reason
  5. Oxford
  6. Cambridge
Рекомендации по теме
Does Classical Theism 1:43:28

Does Classical Theism Secure Monotheism? - Christopher Tomaszewski & Joe Schmid

Is Tradition a 0:02:53

Is Tradition a Good Argument for Classical Theism (w/ Ryan Mullins)

Classical Theism & 2:03:59

Classical Theism & The Limits of Analytic Philosophy - Gaven Kerr & Steven Nemes

Classical Theism & 2:05:49

Classical Theism & the Aloneness Argument - Christopher Tomaszewski & Gil Sanders

Joe Schmid's Insights 1:15:05

Joe Schmid's Insights on Classical Theism, Arbitrary Creation & Reason-Based Action | EP. 1

Christopher Tomaszewski and 1:06:02

Christopher Tomaszewski and Steven Nemes: 'Does Classical Theism Face a Modal Collapse?'

A Pagan Response 0:19:46

A Pagan Response to Monotheism

A Quantum Defense 1:28:07

A Quantum Defense of Classical Theism - Nigel Cundy

From Contingency to 0:44:36

From Contingency to God? | Steven Nemes

Silke-Maria Weineck: The 0:05:16

Silke-Maria Weineck: The Irony Monster. First and Last Deity

Confronting Existential Inertia 2:28:20

Confronting Existential Inertia - Christopher Tomaszewski & Gil Sanders

Largest Religions In 0:00:51

Largest Religions In The World (1900-2100) #shorts

The problem with 0:06:34

The problem with 'Non-Denominational' churches

Is Divine Simplicity 2:10:14

Is Divine Simplicity True? Joe Schmid (@Majesty of Reason) Vs. Fr. Gregory Pine Debate

Why Seek an 0:26:47

Why Seek an Alternative God? | Episode 1210 | Closer To Truth

Naturalism, Classical Theism, 1:07:51

Naturalism, Classical Theism, and First Causes

My conversation with 0:32:50

My conversation with Dr. Ryan Mullins Christian Philosopher #philosophy #Christian

Why Say the 0:15:52

Why Say the Beginning of the Universe Points to God?

Ethics and Religion: 0:09:12

Ethics and Religion: Connecting Religion and Morality

David K. Bernard, 1:41:42

David K. Bernard, J. L. Hall, Robert Morey, & Edgar Havaich Discuss Oneness Pentecostal Theology

Who is Yahweh 0:43:11

Who is Yahweh - How a Warrior-Storm God became the God of the Israelites and World Monotheism

Heaven, Hell, & 1:37:35

Heaven, Hell, & the Human Condition | Jack Symes | Ep 478

Response to Joe 0:27:54

Response to Joe on Existential Inertia

Gnosticism - Cathars 0:31:41

Gnosticism - Cathars and Catharism: Historical Fact or a Delusion of the Inquisition?

Комментарии
Автор

Going rapid fire with these, I see. Love it

christopherjohnson
Автор

Is existence *really distinct* from real?

WorldviewDesignChannel
Автор

Who is the dashing fellow on the bottom?

;)

MajestyofReason
Автор

Now I definitely wanna see Tomaszewski vs Mullins

TheBrunarr
Автор

It's quite easy to demonstrate the uniqueness of pure actuality. If there were two instances of pure actuality, neither of them would be _pure_ actuality. They would be pure actuality PLUS some instantiating factor to differentiate them. Thus, there cannot be multiple instances of pure actuality.

ob
Автор

26:07
Me. Every. Single. Day.

Lol

pumpkinpummeler
Автор

Maybe St. Thomas Aquinas would remind Joe of what he, Thomas teaches about possibility and actuality. God is purely actual. So there can't be two purely actual gods. To tell them apart, we would them to differ from each other. So one would need to have something possibly or actually that the other wouldn't have. If God is purely actual, the other one can't be purely actual.

williammcenaney
Автор

I don't even think you can say that simple being could in principle be anything other than trinitarian, I think it's metaphysically necessary and it follows from what simple being is.

TheBrunarr