Solving ASP.NET Integration Test JSON Parsing Issues with WebApplicationFactory

Discover how to resolve issues with JSON parsing in `ASP.NET` integration tests using `WebApplicationFactory` for seamless testing.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: ASP.NET and integration tests - data returned from WebApplicationFactory is nulled when parsed as JSON

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving ASP.NET Integration Test JSON Parsing Issues with WebApplicationFactory

Integrating tests in ASP.NET can sometimes lead to tricky issues, especially when it comes to JSON parsing. If you’ve been working with WebApplicationFactory for your integration tests and found that the data returned cannot be parsed correctly as JSON, you’re not alone. This post aims to walk you through this common problem and present efficient solutions to ensure your tests run smoothly.

The Problem

While conducting integration tests using the ASP.NET framework, specifically with the WebApplicationFactory, you might encounter a failure similar to the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This discrepancy typically occurs because the properties of the JSON response do not match the property names in your C- model. When running your tests, the response's casing might differ (e.g., name vs. Name), which causes the deserialization process to result in null values or default values, leading to failed assertions.

Example Scenario

Consider you have a very simple ASP.NET application setup with the following code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Unit Test

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Running this test results in null properties. What gives?

The Solution

1. Adjust Property Naming Conventions

The issue arises because the JSON property names are in camel case (e.g., someEnum), while your C- model uses Pascal case (e.g., SomeEnum). To resolve this, you can configure the JSON serializer to adopt the camel case naming convention.

Here's how you can apply this fix:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Use Defaults for Web Serialization

Alternatively, you can simplify your code by reusing the default serializer settings that come with JsonSerializerDefaults.Web. This approach can help you manage various JSON conventions and serialization tasks more effectively.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

When working with integration tests in ASP.NET and facing JSON parsing issues, it's important to align the casing of JSON properties with those defined in your model. Utilizing proper serialization options can seamlessly manage these discrepancies, leading to successful test completions and higher code reliability.

By applying one of the outlined solutions, your integration tests should perform as expected, allowing for smoother developmental progress and greater confidence in your code's robustness.

If you encounter difficulties or have suggestions of your own, feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below!