AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi On SC Verdict On Abrogation Of Article 370 From J&K

preview_player
Показать описание
Article 370 verdict Updates: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the abrogation of Article 370 through a presidential order in 2019. A five-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, held that the abrogation stands valid and that the provision under Article 370 was temporary, which was a result of war conditions at the time.

In the verdict, the top court also noted that the President's order was not mala fide and that Article 370 provides for integration of Jammu and Kashmir and not for disintegration.

#article370 #article35a #supremecourt #jammuandkashmirnews #cjidychandrachud #NayaJammuKashmir

Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.

All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!

India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today YouTube channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.

Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Kudos to SC . Finally we started believing in our Judicial system.

DoYourOwnResearch
Автор

Constitutional morality died the same day when your brother told those idiotic sentences. Do you remember or should I remind you.

mallikarjunrterdal
Автор

Hyderabad did not sign anything but joined India. So why the heartburn?

Islamic emirate of Kashmir valley is over - Kashmiris have been given equal rights to all Indians, that is a matter of celebration

iaf
Автор

Asaduddin, you can't hide your disappointment at the SC verdict.

shaktiprasadmishra
Автор

If India are not secular why you live in India why your community do not going Pakistan. Your for father fighting for Indian freedom struggle but they are created Pakistan for their special Islamic purity country😂😂😂 then why you are crying crocodile tear😢😢

Radhakrishna
Автор

Now how will Nehru show his face to his roommate Jinnah in hell 😢😢

spreddyreds
Автор

Khel katham next population control Bill ucc NRC CAA waqf board abbollition

prashantnaganagoudar
Автор

They do not satisfy Indian Constitution they only satisfy believe Sharia law only faithful Islamic constitution😂😂😂

Radhakrishna
Автор

Appreciated SC decision.... Only Pakistani would be sad.
..😂

ringuanung
Автор

So go to Pakistan.
You will become Happy

men
Автор

Violation of indian constitution , allowing this traitors to speak freely as per arcticle 19 . This is called freedom of speech . This people want secularism? It will never happen, Salute to bjp and modiji govt .

mystics
Автор

Article 370 gave India only a limited say in the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir, including Ladakh, which suited both China and Pakistan .
China was always a player in the so called Kashmir dispute overtly only between India and Pakistan. China wanted Ladakh to link up with Pakistan and Shaksgam valley . State Govt of Jammu and Kashmir, including Ladakh, was sympathetic to Pakistan ‘s and ultimately to China ‘s interests, especially, in Ladakh. Example Late Sheikh Abdullah refused to allow His Holiness The Dalai Lama and his followers to settle in Ladakh when they took refuge in India . Ladakh was most suitable for Tibetans both from climate and cultural points of views. Sheikh Abdullah allowed and financially helped Uyghur Muslims to settle in Kashmir .
India ‘s direct control over both Kashmir and Ladakh has put an end to the China - Pakistani collusion . Present standoff in Ladakh is a joint China- Pakistan conspiracy. Now, China fears losing Tibet and Aksai Chin and Pakistan losing Gilgit and Baltistan

wgmvdfk
Автор

Sir i think you are not in touch with the Kashmir people. They are very happy as they know they are having equal rights like how we all are enjoying all these years. They are benifited by this verdict.

anandhiarvind
Автор

I am not a lawyer nor have a deep knowledge of law. But my basic question is how can Supreme court lay down a deadline to an elected government to give back statehood and to conduct elections. No harm in doing those but shouldnt be GoI given a free hand to do it at right time.

Dvg-vhqx
Автор

Now it's your choice whether to remain an Indian National or not 😂 if not an Indian then you have lot of countries to go, we won't say where you should go, it's again your choice 😅

melodysri
Автор

People who are against the very idea of India aka Bharat are talking about the idea of India and constitution 😅😂

arunb
Автор

YE KYA HUA ? KAISE HUVA ??
BHARAT MATA KI JAI
VANDE MATARAM
JAI HIND JAI HIND JAI HIND

rajalsanjeev
Автор

Indian Born Pakistani's are highly disappointed by this verdict.., 🤣🤣🤣🤣

kynyqtq
Автор

Asad, can you deny that demographic change is made possible only by an alarming rise of the number of Muslims in most parts of our country?

shaktiprasadmishra
Автор

Leave India as you do not respect indian parliament and now indian supreme Court.

subbaraod