GST Updates for Business & Working MUST Watch Episode 1 | #gstguru #gstwithcarahulgupta MUST WATCH

Dear All,
Join our GST Updates Community on Whatsapp:

#gstwithcarahulgupta
#carahulgupta
#gstguru

𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐕𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬,

𝐖𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐟𝐞𝐥𝐭 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐓𝐮𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲. 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞.

𝐎𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥, 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐆𝐒𝐓, 𝐓𝐃𝐒, 𝐄-𝐰𝐚𝐲, 𝐓𝐚𝐱𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐋𝐚𝐰𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐌𝐒𝐌𝐄 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥, 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞. 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐬𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭.

𝐖𝐞 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲. 𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧'𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲, 𝐰𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐮𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.

𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐰𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭. 𝐓𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫, 𝐥𝐞𝐭'𝐬 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.

𝐉𝐚𝐢 𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝!
CA Rahul Gupta
[phone]

HC set aside order and remanded matter to follow procedure prescribed for difference in ITC under GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A

The petitioner was engaged in the business of logistics and there were certain discrepancies between the ITC claimed as per GSTR-3B and GSTR- 2A. The department noticed such discrepancies and directed to reverse the excess claim of ITC. It filed writ petition and contended that it was not given sufficient opportunity to explain the discrepancies.The Honourable High Court noted that the petitioner was not given the opportunity to explain the discrepancies. However, the Court also noted that the CBIC has issued Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated 27-12-2022 and this Circular is made applicable specifically with respect to the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19. But in the instant case, the adjudicating authority has not followed the procedure prescribed in the said Circular.
Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was to be set aside and the matter was remitted back for fresh consideration in terms of the observations made in the Circular.

HC remanded matter as tax demand was raised due to inadvertent error while filing GSTR-1
Amar/hothi Carrying Corporation. Ast. Commisioner (ST) [2024]| 164 taxmana, com 11 (Mad.)
The petitioner was a registered person under GST and engaged in the business of transport of goods. It filed writ petition against the assessment order and contended that the GST was inadvertently shown as payable but the services provided by the petitioner during the assessment period 2019- 2020 were taxable on reverse charge basis by the recipient of services. While filing the GSTR-1 return for the month of October 2019, the petitioner inadvertently failed to indicate that GST was leviable on the service on reverse charge basis.
The Honourable High Court noted that the mistake was corrected in subsequent GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns. The Court also noted that the proceedings were initiated and the petitioner could not participate in such proceedings on account of being unaware of the same until such proceedings culminated in the impugned order. Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was liable to be quashed and matter was remanded back to provide reasonable opportunity to assessee.

7 HC remanded matter for re-adjudication since assessee was unaware of SCN due to non-access of GST portal after closing business
The petitioner had closed his business in 2020 and it did not check the GST portal. The department issued Show Cause Notice (SCN) proposing demand but the SCN was uploaded only on the portal and was not communicated to the petitioner through any other means. Consequently, the petitioner was not able to furnish a reply against the impugned SCN and ex parte order was passed by the department.
The petitioner filed writ petition and contended that it was unaware of any proceedings initiated against it and the demand was raised without providing an opportunity to file reply.
The Honourable High Court noted that the impugned order was passed and it was mentioned in the order that another opportunity to submit reply for the sake of natural justice opportunity for Personal Hearing, as per provisions of Section 75(4) of CGST Act, was also provided to the taxpayer by issuing "REMINDER" though the GST portal. However, the petitioner did not access the portal due to closure of business and could not reply to the said Show Cause Notice.

[amansinha]

Very nice sirji new theme new back ground