CS2 Competitive Ranks are BUGGED?

preview_player
Показать описание
I wonder what's the reason for this.. 🤔

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

And then Valve says they're surprised by how popular Premier is, when competitive doesn't work and every map needs 10 wins to get a rank

istvanlorinczi
Автор

I love that they separated premier and comp, but it takes too long to get a rank.

I'm sure they will fix it eventually

TheRealCatof
Автор

Imagine you have to play over 100h to get rank for each map

xdgjxx
Автор

What would’ve been cool to see is a premier ranking system of silver - global. Once u hit global then the rating system pops up and you’re either like a 20k rated global or up to 50k rated global. And for competitive mode, just have a flat rating system 0 - 30k for each map instead of the ranks.

themagician
Автор

Per map ranking is good but they should lower the amount of wins required for rank to 3 or 4

VeldrN
Автор

I needed 13 games to get my Dust 2 rank, so 10 wins and 3 losses. When I got my rank I had a winstreak of 8 matches! My average ADR was litterally 120+ EVERY game. Of those 13 matches, I was 1st 9 times, 2nd 3 times and 1 time I was 4th of my team. My rank: Silver Elite.. After that I played some more games. I won another 4 matches, still SE. I lost 2 matches (because of shit teammates, still 100+ ADR) and I Deranked to Silver 4. I was Supreme/Global in CSGO. I have played this game 10+ years and never have been under MG1

Sjores
Автор

Ive won over 9 games in a row and havnt ranked up from silver 3 to silver 4.

greighlinv
Автор

In my opinion per map ranking is good, you are not afraid to lose your rank on other maps and you have more to do once you get good rank on favorite map/s, just move to another map. I would keep the per rank map, but would change how the system works. Maybe lower your wins needed to get rank to 5. And make ranking based not on win/lose only, but also on your personal performance in each game. So if you hit 25 kills but lost you wont lose so much elo as when you hit 5 kills and lose.

Zariston
Автор

you get silver, YOU get silver, EVERYBODY gets silver!

Shiruvan
Автор

What I think would be nice if they could change it from 10 matches WON to 10 matches PLAYED, and rank determining your average performance in these 10 matches.

As someone who is only decently good at the game, and a lot of times gets queued with people who don't even communicate, I get 1 win every like 5 matches maybe, which results in 50 matches for ONE SINGLE MAP.
Also some maps people won't even wanna queue for, so it takes ages to find a game.

I would actually like for the normal competitive ranks to come back as ONE entity too, I don't care too much about Premier, just give me my cool visual ranks for playing like a dumbass and I'm happy. Oh and please don't force new players to pay 15€ for Prime, just to get a rank somewhere. I hate that they do that, they wanna make the game Free-2-Play, but then these people can't even get ranked on their performance.

bonesvivi
Автор

I'd love to see something like "map mastery" in CS, something like in League of Legends but instead of champions it's for maps. It would work like if you had a normal rank just like before but also a "mastery rank" which would show your skill on the map that you're currently playing based on number of matches played on it and performance in these matches.

bezdomny
Автор

I think rank per map is an okay Ideia but playing in the map on premier should also increase your map rank,

aquual
Автор

For me, premier is even worse, I was 8k in limited test, and now after release I lost soo many matches at the 10 wins for rank, and I got 1.5k ELO, then managed to climb to 4.8k ELO, and then lost like 20 in a row, and now whenever I get to 4k ELO, and lose, I lose 600 ELO. And that's how it's going, winning couple of matches, getting to 4k then losing one and back to 3.4k, it's a vicious circle and it shit, I only get bad team mates, Russians who doesn't speak English. It's frustrating that Valved didn't make their own region like in league of legends, or something, so that we won't get them here ffs. Who is with me?

danielbready
Автор

I really like the per mani rank system, there’s people out there that know every peak, every cheeky spot to hold; there’s just a good amount of people in the game that only play certain maps, like many of us that played this game for so long it’s evident, but I do feel like 10 games is too much, just make it 5 or some, but that’s just wishful thinking

thisjawn
Автор

You only need 9 won matches; the last one only needs a draw to maintain its rank. I have continuously won on Dust and am still Silver 2.

evex
Автор

I played 12 matches on Office won 10, lost 2 got placed in silver elite master... Haven't played competitive since.

DovCS
Автор

I was LEM in csgo cuz I played that one map for 2000+ hrs. The new per map ranking system makes sense to some extent

Jack-tmvf
Автор

It's messed up on solo queuing across the board(Premier and Competitive). I solo'd to Supreme in CSGO and got put in at Silver 4 for dust2 in CS2 lol. Also, I have a 60% win ratio in premier and got a 4k rating, while on my second account I have a 50% win ratio and I'm at 9k... Broken system.

Potatoshaneko
Автор

also valve 'premier is the most popular gamemode we didn't expect this'

PekaCheeki
Автор

5 months later and they still didn't fixed this bug, silver 1 for life.

Aragon-pk