New Hypothesis Explains How the Big Bang May Have NEVER Happened.

Inspired From:
Eric J. Lerner | President and Chief Scientist of LPPFusion. He is the author of The Big Bang Never Happened.

The new images of the cosmos captured by the James Webb Space Telescope are breathtaking. However, most expert astronomers and cosmologists find them exceedingly shocking and not at all what the theory predicted.

The authors repeatedly remark in the rush of technical astronomical publications released online since July 12 that the images show a shockingly large number of galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly faint, and surprisingly ancient. There are many surprises, some of which are not always pleasant. The title of one paper begins with a direct exclamation: "Panic!"

It is not difficult to understand why these too few, too smooth, too ancient, and too many galaxies are incompatible with the Big Bang theory.

But, before we go any further, it's important to note that these discoveries have not yet been peer-reviewed.

Big Bang theorists have known for years that Hubble Space Telescope images indicate the existence of these small, ultra-dense "Mighty Mouse" galaxies. Unfortunately, James Webb has made things worse.

The same theories suggest that small galaxies evolve into modern galaxies by colliding and merging to become more spread out.

James Webb saw disproportionately smooth discs and tidy spiral shapes, similar to what we find in today's galaxies. According to the findings in the "Panic!" article, smooth spiral galaxies were around "ten times" as abundant as theory expected, and this “would challenge our ideas about mergers being a very common process”. In a nutshell, this evidence completely demolishes the merger theory.

With few or no mergers, small galaxies cannot expand to be a hundred times larger. As a result, they were never small, and hence the optical illusion promised by the expanding universe concept does not occur. However, no illusion implies no expansion: the illusion is an essential consequence of expansion. As a result, Big Bang proponents are in a state of fear. Small and smooth galaxies imply no expansion and, as a result, no Big Bang.

And according to the theory, there is nothing that could have been prior to the Big Bang. The existence of these galaxies proves that the Big Bang did not occur at all!

But is this possible? To put it another way, could our universe have no beginning?

The Big Bang is the idea that in the distant past, our universe was hotter, denser, and more uniform. It is not the notion that things became arbitrarily hot and dense to the point that the laws of physics no longer applied.

It is the idea that as the Universe expanded, cooled, and gravitated, we destroyed our excess antimatter, becoming protons, neutrons, light nuclei, atoms, and, eventually, stars, galaxies, and, ultimately, the Universe we know today. It is no longer considered that space and time arose from a singularity 13.8 billion years ago.

In a nutshell; the Big Bang may not be the absolute beginning of the Universe, but it may be the origin of our Universe as we know it. If it is, it won't be "the" beginning of everything, but it would be "our" beginning. It may not be the full tale in and of itself, but it is an important element of the larger cosmic story that binds us all.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Tags:
#nasa #jwst #bigbang #CEERS-93316 #astronomy #NGC-628 #NGC346 #SN1987a #TRAPPIST-1E #smac0723 #J0624-6948 #bigbang #supernova #jwst1stimage #jwstasteroidhit #webbtelescopeupdates #rockyworld #exoplanets #55Cancrie #jwstnews #jwstupdate #mars #saturn #cassini #saturnrings #saturnmoon #jameswebbspacetelescope #webbtelescope #jwst #universe #mysterioussignal #galaxy #webbtelescopeupdates #jwstimages #photons #firstgalaxy #webbtelescopeupdates #interstellar #webbselfie #webbtelescopeimage #alienlife #jwstasteroid #asteroidtracking #jameswebbspacetelescope #nasa #galaxy #star #spacenews #nasanews #webbtelscopenewimages #HD84406 #webbtelescopeupdates

[desertmaverick]

I've always thought it very arrogant that in a span of just a few decades man basically has figured out how the universe began. Especially because of how long the universe has existed before man even existed. I realize that most of what we "think we know" is just theory. But it's all talked about like we know what we are saying is fact. What happened to phrases like, might be, could be, it may be possible and such. This new information just humbled many of our scientific theories. Nothing stays the same. Everything changes.

[jonathantodd]

As a Christian who believes that God created the Earth I am actually NOT shocked.

[blocksterz]

"Beginning and End" are merely a human concepts created by us, just like anything else make logic to us doesn't necessarily works on a cosmic level

[JoeShmoism]

there is nothing to fear when attaining new knowledge disproves something we were certain was true. it only means we weren't as smart as we thought.

[ErikPehrsson]

In the beginning, God said, “Let there be light, ” and there was light. That’s your “Big Bang” right there 👌 ✅

[jtv]

TO ANYONE WHO WATCHES THIS VIDEO. “Not peer reviewed” is pretty important to remember.

[Iammrspickley]

What appears a simple thing, turns out much more complicated most of times...that the universe has some unforeseen complexity in store can't be a surprise

[anonymouschicken]

The actual conclusion of the paper being discussed is copied and pasted below. Note that “Z” (example, z > 3) refers to the amount of light years that the light from those galaxies has traveled to reach us, in billions of light years. So when the paper says it examined galaxies in the Z= 3-6 range, it is referring to galaxies whos light is 3-6 billion years old. The oldest galaxies JWST has discovered, for reference, are around Z = 16-18 I believe, so keep in mind that we’re still a long ways off from the beginning of the universe here.

“Our key findings are:
I. The morphological types of galaxies changes less quickly than previously believed, based on precursor HST imaging and results. That is, these early JWST re- sults suggest that the formation of normal galaxy struc- ture was much earlier than previously thought.
Early JWST Galaxy Structure 9

10 Ferreira et al.
II. A major aspect of this is our discovery that disk galaxies are quite common at z ∼ 3 − 6, where they make up ∼ 50% of the galaxy population, which is over 10 times as high as what was previously thought to be the case with HST observations. That is, this epoch is surprisingly full of disk galaxies, which observationally we had not been able to determine before JWST.
III. Distant galaxies at z > 3 in the rest-frame opti- cal, despite their appearance in the HST imaging, are not as highly clumpy and asymmetric as once thought. This effect has not been observed before due to the na- ture of existing deep imaging with the HST which could probe only ultraviolet light at z > 3. This shows the great power of JWST to probe rest-frame optical where the underlying mass of galaxies can now be traced and measured.
This study is the first examination of the problem of distant galaxy morphology with JWST, and specifically the formation of galaxy structure at z > 3. Our results suggest many directions for immediate future study. We have not included any new JWST galaxies that were not seen with HST, and have not examined the structural properties as a function of stellar mass or other physical
properties. All of these will need to be fully examined in the future.
The present study, however, shows the importance of JWST for understanding the structural evolution of galaxies, which is now open for detailed investigation.”

Love this channel, but this paper does not in any way suggest that the Big Bang didn’t happen.

[RidiculousRocketry]

The JWST is proving to be a game changer and worth the time and investment. Something the scientific community should be very proud of. Hopefully we continue to dream big and explore.

[krishna_]

The JWST has already begun to show us how little we actually know and theorized about our Universe. This is not a bad thing, as it challenges us to reevaluate what we thought we know and points us in the direction of discovering more new and enlightening things. Aristotle was correct when he wrote, "The more you know, the more you realize you don't know." I can't wait to see what else the JWST discovers.

[lars]

Nothing got worse and there is no panic, it is science.

[gairmac]

Some may panic, some may fear - I just get excited...

[wolf]

You mean to say we don't know everything??? LOL!! The amount of stuff we don't know we don't know, is way larger than the stuff we think we

[Tugela]

I think the bigger issue is you not understanding what the "big bang" actually is. It is NOT an explosion that started at a specific point, rather it is space itself expanding. The big bang started everywhere in the observable universe, not just in one spot. There might well have been things existing in space prior to that starting and the expansion could very well be a natural process that occurs routinely over a much larger space time. However, due to the nature of the expansion there is a limit to what we can observe. The universe is NOT limited simply to what we can observe, nor is it a mathematical model. The true nature of the universe is beyond our comprehension and should not be confused with the mathematical models we create to describe its behaviour.

[jimblake]

At 0:43 ... How can the galaxies be "too few" and also "too many" in the same statement?

[MikeJw-jexk]

"In a nutshell; the Big Bang may not be the absolute beginning of the Universe, but it may be the origin of our Universe as we know it. If it is, it won't be "the" beginning of everything, but it would be "our" beginning. It may not be the full tale in and of itself, but it is an important element of the larger cosmic story that binds us all." To me, that conflicts with his "The Big Bang may have never happened"

[oldmanfunky]

This is GREAT! Keep in mind back in the 1920's we thought galaxies were spiral nebulae and part of our own galaxy. So now we have some more pieces of the galactic puzzle and I for one find it exciting!

[OblivionFalls]

What JWST actually showed is that disc-shaped galaxies were more common in the early universe than we previously thought. This does not require any changes to The Big Bang model, only minor adjustments to our models for early galaxy formation. Enough with the clickbait :/

[cgivensldr]

Can you imagine white holes spewing out actual black holes and matter also?

[scottmacdonald]

I always liked the theory of black hole's pulling everything in and white hole's pushing everything back out in a never-ending cycle.