Corbells ‘Jellyfish UFO’ DEBUNKED! NOT a UFO / UAP - It has been IDENTIFIED!

Credit: Marc D'Antonio on the Dead Air:

My Jeremy Corbell video:

This is a follow up video to my Jeremy Corbell Debunked video. In this video I debunk the now infamous Jellyfish UFO. The footage was shot over a US military base in Iraq - shot in 2017 or 2018. Corbell said on the podcast with Steve O that he thought it was credible because he had ‘first hand witness information of a jellyfish UFO going under water and then shooting off at a 45 degree angle'. Let's discuss

#ufo #Debunked #jellyfishUFO

[CumtownAndConspiracyClips]

Who else thought it was gonna be the pokemon Alakazam from the thumbnail! 😂✋

[datacipher]

Mick west already debunked this literally hours after it came out. There’s no parallax here, he determined it’s coming from a fixed cameras. He determined the location, and the object isn’t moving fast. It’s moving 10mph - the same as the wind that night.

[bartf]

mate, get your facts straight. The balloon picture was made after the fact of the Jellyfish video, by someone that wants to debunk it, mick west.

[WallE]

You didn't debunk anything with a picture of something someone Drew themselves

[ebkesq]

Are there any photographs of balloons of this type? What you showed appeared to be a drawing made by someone after the “Jellyfish UFO” footage aired.

[farquoi]

2:39 It's misleading and irrelevant that the ballon match the jellyfish perfectly. that's not a photo but a mockup that was MADE to match the video. And why are there english letters?

[GodzillasDentist]

Most of the balloons I buy are only visible to infrared. Costs a bit extra but worth it.

[mrssnopek]

It's funny to me that anyone would assume that the military wouldn't know what balloons look like through their own equipment. Training would be pointless if it didn't include identifying everyday objects. Good thing you guys are around to keep us all informed. 😂

[johnnyringo]

I used to think that Jeremy Corbell was just a dude a bit too caught up in his own fantacies but I'm now arriving at the conclusion that he is a charlatan. These kinds of examples of his f ups are mounting up.

[HunniebeeGames]

ok but the balloons dont move independently or bounce of one another?

[yosemitesam]

Didn’t it disappear into the ocean and then came back out after approximately 10 minutes

[williamrobison]

It is clearly one solid rigid object, not a cluster of balloons.

[lloydsLegends]

U didn't debunk anything...you have a suggestion as to what it could be (which is plausible) but that's it.

[stonaraptor]

oof look up the definition of the word debunked. I am sceptical aswell but you didn't debunk anything, you speculated.

[AlienBros]

Except this proves absolutely nothing because there are clear scenes where the object has a completely different appearance than the one you're using.

[Kevin-qxsi]

Try again. You did not convince me it’s balloons.

[offgridrvliving]

This is impossible for those with conflicting world views to comprehend. The ability of humans to close their minds like a steel trap is endless.

[biggunsclub]

Do a little experiment and set off a helium balloon outside. Balloons don't move along at the same altitude they fly up at quite a speed. Not saying it's a UAP but it's unlikely a balloon unless it's at very high altitude.

But I bet the second video of the item going into water then shooting off doesn't exist. That video would truly prove something. I think people including Jeremy Corbell simply want this to be true and it's good for his podcast.

[rg]

Apparently theres a 2nd video of it descending into water, then emerging and flying off at high speed 20mins later....

[sciencefordreamers]

Very interesting, to make it a better argument you should make a 3D model of the proposed known object and view it from the same angle as the unknown. Then you can really compare side by side.