[4K] KINGDOMS OF AMALUR: RECKONING ORIGINAL vs REMASTER PC - Comparaison graphismes & Frame rate

preview_player
Показать описание
Analyse des graphismes et du frame rate de KINGDOMS OF AMALUR: RE-RECKONING sur PC (2160p) : quelles différences par rapport à la version d'origine de 2012 ?
Les options sont au max sur les deux versions, en 4K UHD.

---DETAILS---
CPU : R7 3800X @4GHz (all cores)
GPU : RTX 2080 Gigabyte Gaming OC
RAM : 16Go @3600MHz CL16
Drivers : 452.06
OS : Win 10 Pro 64-bit

---LE RESTE---
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Guys remember dont dislike the video because the remaster is bad. Like the video because the creator did a great comparison.

callmenovice
Автор

you need to buy a microscope along with the game to find the differences..

horrorspidey
Автор

So basically same visuals but with half the FPS...amazing!

pikodin
Автор

And they expect owners of the original to pay half the price

marcosamell
Автор

Soooo. Basically they applied a reshade lol

GamingandFrightened
Автор

Barely any change but the frame rate collapsed that much!?

RicochetForce
Автор

kingdoms of amalur: re-rekt your fps. rtx 2080 put to its knees running a 2012 game.

LamGorYun
Автор

Remaster = Same as using Re-Shade and SweetFX. That being said, I'm still supporting by buying it for the DLC and in hopes of reviving the IP and more games get developed :)

torinux
Автор

Add some shadows and you can call it remaster, what a Joke!

eziofranchisse
Автор

same 3D models with little better textures and effects . This could be easily update as a patch .

Buffy_Slayer
Автор

As much as I really want the remaster I think I will be waiting for a large sale on this. This is the furthest thing from a remaster that I have ever seen!

loganponthier
Автор

At least we have an amazing trailer with another strong and independent woman, and she is so strong because she eats fps every day.

HijoDeMilPatas
Автор

Disappointment. After what i saw with Destroy all Humans, i really expected the same level of improvement but no.. this is a joke.

Vasilis
Автор

Notice a 10% difference in GPU load between the two as well. Something definitely isn't right. Maybe we'll see a hotfix soon or a driver update.

greevir
Автор

literally looks the same with slightly increased texture resolution, and somehow thrice the file size? they've gotta be joking

DankMemeTeacher
Автор

To be fair, they did say that the remaster is mainly gameplay tweaks and such. But they will not win any medals for best remaster and they way higher GPU usage is kind of odd.

Sveakungen
Автор

Graphics are the least of what's been changed. Changed all difficulties, added new very hard difficulty, how level scaling works, xp distribution, and change how loot is distributed. They also made the files more accessible for modders.

Akrymir
Автор

The real difference is in comparing the console versions. The difference in graphics and frame rate will be much more between PS3 and PS4 than the two PC versions.

SatansLeadGuitarist
Автор

Donc en gros, la seule amélioration qu'apporte le remaster, c'est de diminuer tes FPS par deux et de te faire racheter le jeu, super, on se sent si peu enfiler !

blouchiwa
Автор

Oh ffs, and to think I was looking forward to this

josharaujo