‘Cringy’: Weighing the risks vs. rewards of Stormy Daniels’ testimony 

preview_player
Показать описание
Legal analyst Lisa Rubin and Danny Cevallos joins Morning Joe to recap Day 13 of former President Trump's criminal hush money trial, including Stormy Daniels' much-anticipated appearance on the witness stand. Was it worth it? 



Follow MSNBC Show Blogs

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.

Connect with MSNBC Online

‘Cringy’: Weighing the risks vs. rewards of Stormy Daniels’ testimony

#Trump #StormyDaniels #Trial
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The fact that they are trying to shut her down now is proof of why they were trying to shut her down then.

peterharris
Автор

It proved how devastating her story would have been if it had come out before the election .

michaelrowsell
Автор

Her description was MOTIVE. This was why Trump paid her to shut up.

SwampHodag
Автор

Stop overthinking it, her testimony was vital, and if I was a juror I'd feel cheated if she never took the stand.

joanfrellburg
Автор

Stormy’s story reveals what Trump was trying so hard to prevent from becoming public. I think that was superbly established.

sandymacchioni
Автор

Nothing says "I'm too old" like Pert Plus and Old Spice.

sparkytdg
Автор

The GOP are delighted to have Mr Trump represent them in the forth coming election. He embodies all the qualities and standards the GOP hold dear!

TheCaster
Автор

The fact that the defense failed to object is important as to the success of any appeal.

sallyfoxboro
Автор

Risk - Reward?
How about the defense FAILING to object to testimony and the Judge stating this on the record!!!!

grannyvroomvroom
Автор

I think the defense lawyers were interested in finally hearing the truth; the reason they didn’t object.

deborc
Автор

I would be ok with Trump in jail for 30 days.. silence is bliss

RichardRamsey-suhe
Автор

Instead of shaming the woman who makes millions, let’s shame the criminal who used stolen funds to pay her.

tamz
Автор

We've all seen that side of DT before -in plain sight. Do we forget the way he chose to stalk behind Hillary at the debate, looming over her physically, using his size to attempt to intimidate a woman? The context was different, but the character of the man was the same.

catherine
Автор

I loved when Judge Merchan told Mr Blanche he was surprised Blanche didn't object more. It's now on record, so the Trump team can't come back with requesting a mistrial.

Lauren_
Автор

She noticed and remembered the things and details of the room so well because she didn't want to be in the situation. It's a trauma/fear thing that is super common. Those details might be insignificant but you remember them because you want to take yourself out of the situation that you're fearful of.

crImsngen
Автор

If the case gets overturned in 2 years i wont care as long as he's not president!

lindascott
Автор

The defense could have objected more, and the judge has said he was surprised that they didn't because he would have sustained the objections. They didn't object, but now they want to cry foul. That's not a strong basis for an appeal.

UMVELINQANGI
Автор

Lisa Rubin is working such long hours & never appears to either look tired or sound tired. She is at the moment the most hardworking MSNBC employee

maudeboggins
Автор

Job one is keeping him from being able to destroy this country as a democracy.

iywzgux
Автор

The whole case has stemmed from the encounter. Some detailed testimony about it is warranted, or even required. The purpose of putting her on the stand wss to prove that it happened. Without such testimony, prosecution's case would be incomplete, and the jury would be left puzzled.

pma