MLG Weekly Episode 8: MLG Anaheim Halo Reach Recap

A condensed recap of the Halo: Reach tournament that happened at MLG Anaheim.

[CrownedGD]

G4u, I would love to see you make one game, and make a completely different game the next year and see how many fans you get. I liked Halo Reach, but there is many people who are saying Halo Reach really sucked because it was too different. It's not the same game every year, they add on some features onto the games and the next game would have those features expound upon- in comparison to Halo Reach to Halo 3 and MW2 to MW3, the changes made are quite the same.

[mayuri]

a return does not finish a game, but i guess people just say 9it does anyway

[Eggerix]

I know and they don't upgrade it so often..

[TheToxiic]

can some1 plz awenser my question how do u get into the mlg

[TheFalloutShot]

thats because they havn change the engine

[Eggerix]

CoD1-CoD4 were the best ones and then started being the same game every time, no graphical changes, same looking weapons and a new skin pack. Oh and new campaign which is the only thing I play now because multiplayer gets old, Halo doesn't. And why the hell you reply to 10 months old comment, leave me alone..

[Eggerix]

@thatgyrlactive And cod is the same game every year -.- I like halo more than cod

[TheBanderson]

Did you just hear their Reach stats? 41-1 since forming the squad..I think that should permit me to say that the team is something special, not just some random kids popping, as you put it. Even in H2 the Ogre's were at the top of the game. Pro's didnt stop getting better because of Reach being unplayable, they were not able to improve like the younger kids because of brain chemistry. Learning something at a younger age gives you an advantage that older people cannot learn at the same rate.

[CrownedGD]

I'm sorry- it's 10 months old- therefore its not a comment anymore? "CoD1-CoD4 was the best ones"- Hear that all the time but I would never choose to play CoD4 over MW3, although CoD4 was a good game. And I still play it- Kinda stuck playing it lol. If I was a snobbish propagandist fanboy- I would say that Halo 2 and Halo 3 are the same game, just different weapons. But ways to play are different.

[GETxSME]

and yeah cod is more competetive than halo now, sad to say bcuz that game is annoying. and in halo 2, getting to a lvl 30 was challenging, but in halo 3 getting a 30 took a day bcuz the ranking system was horrible. they should make it like halo 2's, where you had to win sometimes 3-5 games in a row each rank to level up, then you'd rarely see any 40+s..

[GETxSME]

it is way too slow, halo 3 was dumbed down by a couple yards, but reach was dumbed down by miles upon miles, it wasnt even playable. thats why so many players started getting worse, example Walshy, he was arguably the greatest halo 2 player ever, and in halo 3 it was just horrific, same with reach..now you got garbage players popping outta nowhere, like enable, roy, teams from status quo, instinct, lunchbox, igoturpistola, etc. halo 2 proved to be the most competetive game ever.

[GETxSME]

hopefully halo 4 is way better than reach, bcuz this game blows.

[GETxSME]

dude, your not undeerstanding it..halo 2 was the most competetive fast paced game outta the halo franchise, no question. final boss dominated halo 2, it was always team carbon, str8 rippin or xit woundz, to try and challenge FB, cant remember anyone else. halo 3 was eh so so, still a dumbed down slower game. halo reach was just flat out garbage, too slow and too much BS in the game. halo 4 is much better than halo reach by a long shot, but still the game acts like it but only better, still bad..