Maggie Thatcher - rich vs poor

preview_player
Показать описание
#shorts
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It is by far one of the best sum ups ever to the concept of socialist policies.

keepingitwild
Автор

We'll never have someone like her. It's too late. People are already got used to socialism.

panamahub
Автор

She gets no recognition for this. Only hate.

OlliGarch
Автор

"Americans would rather be equal in slavery, than unequal in freedom."

Alexis Tocqueville

SerErryk
Автор

What is the gap between the poorest person in america, vs the poorest person in lets say india? Either way HEAR HEAR, Madamme.

FM-dmxj
Автор

“In general, the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.” ~ Voltaire

UnschoolingCOM
Автор

Wait environment carbon tax 🤔 that's all the wicked witch.

TaurusDragon
Автор

I've heard this stupid argument my entire life and it is never going to go away UNLESS it is really resolved.

I have an idea for how to do that. Design government employee NET-WORTH (not income) around where the bottom 50% (or percentage to be determined) of the population is in terms of net-worth or income or something between those.

In other words tie the net-worth of all government employees (no exceptions) to the net-worth (or TBD) to the bottom 50% of the society.

You watch how fast that resolves the disparity argument... And BTW, I would get rid of all price controls on labor. In other words no minimum wage, no welfare, no handouts, no subsidies.

Also, I don't know what the exact formula should be, I just know that politicians and government employees are in general, thieves. Well here is how you fix two birds with one stone. It is just the details of the formula that have to be worked out.

kmg
Автор

Thacher was correct. All of you had word salad for breakfast.

janet
Автор

_Ignoring the fact that rich&poor are being caused by governmental interventions in the otherwise free market.._
The honorable gentlemen was pointing out that the tide raised the bigger ships higher than it did the smaller boats and the honorable lady answers by telling him that he'd rather wanted no raise at all. Talk about cognitive dissonance on the part of the honorable lady.
_IMHO a bad video to make a case for libertarian policy. Very very bad choice (unless your brain can't comprehend what has been said)._

joansparky
Автор

The core issue of modern capitalism isn’t inequality. It’s poverty and centralized control.

FunderDuck
Автор

Let’s see, the gap between the top 10%and the bottom 10% has widened. That means the group in the middle, the people between the top and the bottom, ie the middle class, has expanded. Hasn’t that been a goal of governments around the world for generations?

ricoman
Автор

Large wealth gap is harmful to the entire society, that's common sense in economics. Thatcher seems got no knowledge on economics.

ajbahlam
Автор

Poors and rich should be richer and richer. But the poor-rich gap should be watched, whatever the intrinsic qualities of each human, the gap should be quite reasonable. We've gone too far.

MattMotivation