A website every .NET developer should be aware of #Shorts

[magic]

Understanding lowering removes a lot of the magic behind new features and helps deepen my understanding!

[vinzerfrie]

this is actually helpful in very specific cases of extreme performance needs or branchless code

[michalski]

love this!! I don’t use dotnet but it has so much features and is so complex that its always fun to disassemble

[MichaelOyer]

Yes! It's also a great tool for seeing how your code transpiles from F# to C# when learning F#. An example: make an F# record and be surprised how much C# is being written for you.

[jongeduard]

It's great. But I also know it's limitations.
In many aspects the ILSpy application is still a LOT better (though I am quite sure Sharplab uses ILSpy as well, but not all the options).
Because ILSpy still gives more options. I like how I can configure how exactly I want an assembly to be decompiled. While what Sharplab shows you is basically a decompilation to C# version 1.0 syntax.
What I especially often do is the option to show IL combined with C# (shown in comments). Sharplab should really implement that feature as well!

[Foodies-pvih]

very help full video, looking for more like this in depth, thanks

[darkopz]

They need to release a stand alone version that works in VScode. Pasting your code into a third party site seems like a no-no.

[jorg]

Pretty cool :) I am in the middle of optimizing an implementation, this comes in handy

[mahesh_rcb]

It's also greate when u just want to execute quick code samples without having to open vs or other editors.

[ИванИванов-яэк]

Thanks. Can it change Reflector or Dotpeek? How do you, guys, think?

[SebGruch]

Scenario from two weeks ago - I had my beautiful library code for .Net Standard 2.1, with C# 9 features all around... And out of the sudden the requirement was raised to port it back to be .Net 4.8 and Standard 2.0 compatible (multi-target)... If only I know about it sooner, wouldn't have to amend all the code (semi)manually...

[canberkurus]

Is it possible to see this lowered code in the Visual Studio ?

[fleedum]

Was there an app like Dev.to for .NET content or C#?

Looking at the low-level code can give us a view how a developer's life look like if no high-level code

[TheCodingColtrane]

Guys, what the static keyword do in c# ? I still don't get it after reading a lot websites

[FireCrauter]

Where can I see the c# code of an extension/method, in namespaces like system.linq etc.

It can only be seen by buying visual studio ?.
ps: It was in a video of yours.

[serhii]

YOUR COMPUTER HAS VIRUS accent always so funny

[سعيدأمير-وق]

That is useless (at least not a website that every .net developer should be aware of) unless you love boasting in front of others.
Anyway thanks and keep the good content.

[ishimaro]

That's just too much information, to be honest. Aren't you satisfied with VS / Resharper refactoring capabilities? and why do we need to understand the low level / IL for us .NET developers, don't you trust the compiler, no?