Pray for a woman named Daniela because she suffers from lung cancer.Pray that she may converts to the Catholic faith if she is not Catholic and may she be healed
Pelovchaneca
TLM-appreciater here, but I attend NO if I absolutely must. Lib Catholics always complain about “Radtrads”, but I spent my whole childhood at various NO churches and one thing I notice is that their complaints hold no water in reality. In reality TLM-goers tend to be more faithful to the magisterium and hold the utmost respect for the Pope and the faith. Not to mention how much more inspiring the community has been to my family and I. TLM all the way baby!
macroglossumstellatarum
I go to both the SSPX and my NO. There is a marked difference in the theology and intent of these 2 masses. I have been doing this for over 8 years going to both masses every Sunday. The SSPX preist always upholds respect for the Pope and the bishops and admonished the faithful for any type of attitude that displays anl position that negates the NO church as the true Vhurch. They always guide to faithful to the doctrines of the Church and never Pope bash. Ever. They acknowledge there are problems and address them when they arise but never bash the Pope. And they tell us to stay away from internet preachers and commentators.
minorityvoice
Farsi (persians) are Aryans ethnically, and so are closer to Hellenic and Germanic people, than they are to Arabs, actually
creativebutmmo
There's a fine line between Canonization and Politics. On the one hand, we want clear "contemporary" examples of folks whose Saintly lives confirm--"by faith to faith"--that the Gospel is God's Righteousness (eg Romans 1:17, etc), and as close to the present day as possible, so that these people are in our memories, and we don't just think the stories of saintliness are embellished haigiographies. On the other hand, it seems the full import of what a True Saint actually accomplished can't even begin to be understood until generations later, so rapid Canonization seems to be a bag of worms in itself
WayneDrake-ukgg
Much of what you were saying in the first 1/4 was very enlightening. But then you said “it wouldn’t require any sort of magisterial teaching to withhold your assent to that teaching” and gave the example of a Pope teaching that it would be immoral to criminalize disordered relations.
I really struggle with this. By what authority am I granted this freedom? The farthest I have been able to take this personally is that a teaching may come from the Holy Father which I strongly disagree with, but that it is still my duty to ask “is it POSSIBLE for this teaching to be correct”, and as long as I maintain that openness then perhaps I would not fall into disobedience, even if I strongly think it could be ‘heresy’. But to outright decide that a teaching of the Holy Father is heresy seems to conflict with what it is to be part of the Catholic faith. What am I missing?
You (and likely much of your audience) are more learned and read on these topics than I. Perhaps someone could help me reconcile this tension?
atlas
Is Lofton the leader of the Popesplainers?
AWSKAR
1:32:00 "baptism of βlood is something that necessarily sαves the individual, so" How is this (& veneration of Coptic mαrtyrs) reconciled with Eugene IV: "No one, even if he pour out his βlood for the Nαme of Christ, can be sαved, unless he remain within...the Cαtholic Chυrch."
rx
What in Vatican II taught implicit faith?
chrisloftson
I asked a question about Ad Splendidum Nitentis on the dissent video, but unfortunately no one responded. Since it was mentioned in this stream, I will ask again in the hope of gaining a greater understanding.
I've read through Ad Splendidum a couple of times and see it mentions clerics should lose orders if they commit those certain acts, but I don't see it mention civil penalties. My assumption was that Pope Francis was saying the acts aren't criminal in the sense that those who commit them shouldn't be jailed or executed. I want to understand what I am missing here. Is your claim that Ad Splendidum says there should be civil penalties for the act, or is your claim that Pope Francis was saying clerics shouldn't lose orders for committing the acts?
Heckart
Please I want the name of your intro please ?
snowyskylar
Woohoo made a guest appearance 1:34:25 <3
emmanuelsimon
55:38 federal agents getting into Thomism these days, good development
rx
Is Farsi similar to Arabic?
Generally, no. While Farsi incorporates many Arabic loanwords due to historical influences, the two languages belong to different families with different grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Knowing Farsi only enables a speaker to understand Arabic, and vice versa, with additional study.
MJK
please answer why the vatican has signed the C-40 agreement
nkoppa
I recant the stuff I said about Dr Nemes.
GregorasProject
SSPX didn’t have supplied jurisdiction, that’s not how supplied jurisdiction works. You should talk to Salza about this.
austinkent
saying that josemaría escrivá, mother theresa, paul vi, jp ii, etc. are infallibly in heaven isn't really a position you wanna hold to. i agree canonisations are infallible too, but to say that the Church is what's canonising these people is a bit silly, some of these "saints" practiced hinduism, were communists, etc. on their death beds - to say that they're in heaven is to say the Church has defected.
2:45:51
0:24:52