YNW Melly's Lawyer Blasts State's Case, Urges Jury to Set Rapper Free in Closing Argument

preview_player
Показать описание
During his closing argument, defense attorney Stuart Adelstein attempted to poke holes in the state’s theory that YNW Melly killed his best friends, YNW Juvy and YNW SakChaser, because he was angry, greedy, and wanted to be initiated into the Bloods gang. “There is a lack of evidence,” he said. “There is a conflict in the evidence. The evidence itself and the investigation itself stinks. I’d use another word but I’d probably be held in contempt.”

#YNWMelly #JamellDemons #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

From what ive seen, i think the defense did a good job considering what theyre up against. They see everything against them before the trial and have to know which way to fight the case. Reasonable doubt is really the only thing they could attack to free him. For everyone saying the defense is terrible, what should they have done differently??🤔

coopdeville
Автор

I love closing arguments and this is the reason why. Melly got his money worth!! This lawyer did a great job and was very expressive and gravitating. I thought i was watching "a time to kill"😅

MJ
Автор

They should have had Bortlen’s trial first! He drove them to the hospital! He knows without a doubt what happened!

beffis
Автор

The crazy thing about Jury’s…. You never know what they are thinking… I learned that after Casey A.

TammieBuckeye
Автор

His defense attorney was a true dog in this case! He really went to bat for bruh w this one. His whole career is going to elevate even more after this case. Hats off counsel! 👏🏾

mcqueeninvestments
Автор

What this defence attorney speaks is very convincing! 👏

Greezly__
Автор

I’m with Melly’s attorney without all the rambling. He made valid points very serious valid statements about the DA’s and the incredible investigation the detectives performed as well the witnesses repented statements it lacks to an entirety to prove guilt. The defense should have slammed the door on the state since they opened it with hidden text messages from Quando Rondo being… he is linked to other murders and being incarcerated as this trial was ongoing for other crimes. As said too much evidence is missing to prove guilt.

promoteammetronashville
Автор

Whatever Melly paid him, he was worth every penny. This man is really good

tezesquire
Автор

I don’t understand how someone could get the death penalty without a murder weapon, gun shot residue or DNA. They only have the phone to go on. I’ll be interested to see what the verdict is.

leah
Автор

I’m convinced this guy swung for the fence and hit a home run! If I was a juror, NOT GUILTY!!

Ghost.
Автор

If he gets acquitted the prosecution cannot blame anyone but themselves! They flopped this case thinking they could be sneaky against top defense attorneys!

JessLBreen
Автор

I just hope the jury uses common sense. The states whole case was horrible

deannadanielle
Автор

Dont know much about the case.. butThat snoop dog throwing up gang signs argument was effective!

stevekelley
Автор

The defence done a great job in his closing argument. Outlined the case perfectly. There's no way they find Melly guilty.

ShnilChay
Автор

Well, to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say.

torydejesus
Автор

This Lawyer is the one that should
Have been FIRED! The JUROR THAT CAUSED THE CONTROVERSY SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATED, HER ACTIONS WERENT NORMAL!!
MAY BE A MELLY PAYOFF!!

veramoszczynski
Автор

I think there’s a good chance he did do it but this absolutely was one of the weakest cases I’ve ever seen against someone. Even if they proved he was in the car at some point they have absolutely no proof he pulled a trigger. They have no gun, no eyewitnesses, no gunshot residue and the investigation was botched at multiple places. There is absolutely reasonable doubt to me and I think he may have done it. The state didn’t prove that though, not even close

jleezy
Автор

Now we wait for the verdict ?? I can’t wait to hear what the jury has to say.

sharonbrown
Автор

I DONT CARE WHAT ANYONE SAYS. This DEFENSE IS AMAZING!!! I really know the law!and these dudes have did everything they possibly could used everything they could and i hope they make it work!! If melly is free he owes them so much love man

therealtorking
Автор

Not Guilty no proof he was the shooter so must be not GUILTY 😞

killieboxing