The characteristic polynomial is cooler than you thought!

preview_player
Показать описание
🌟Support the channel🌟

🌟my other channels🌟

🌟My Links🌟

🌟How I make Thumbnails🌟

🌟Suggest a problem🌟
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

What are those less known prefactors for e.g. 4×4? Do they have a specific name?

eiseks
Автор

If I remember correctly, the trace and the determinant are invariants of the matrix (they don't change value under linear transformations). Are those other coeficientes of the n×n characteristic polynomial also invariants?

InverseTachyonPulse
Автор

Cayley Hamilton theorem, it is fascinating. Also, an eigenvector solves the characteristic equation

joseivan
Автор

So if the eigenvalues span the eigenspace and the geometric multiplicity matches the algebraic multiplicity, we have a bijective relation between the eigenvalues and any arbitrary combination of the terms of a polynomial, as long as the dimensions of the eigenspace and the polynomial match. This indicates that the matrix is diagonalizable and that the characteristic equation provides a complete and direct representation of the eigenspace itself. If these conditions are not met, then you'll encounter residual terms (dependencies) that need to be addressed. I haven't seen this particular form of the characteristic equation before, but it makes sense given that the trace is just the sum of the eigenvalues counted with its algebraic multiplicity!

jaredroussel
Автор

I'd like to learn more about this, thanks! 😀

JJ_TheGreat
Автор

So basically the trace determines the threshold of its eigenvalues?

alexandershapiro
Автор

What is the "trace" of a matrix?
Thanks!

JJ_TheGreat
Автор

This has no business being in my feed. Good luck to you😂

sethoakes
Автор

Wow nice characteristic you have there.

joshgulrud
Автор

Do you think you know math when you pass your calculus class? Just wait for some guy on YouTube shorts to do algebra 💀

marshall
Автор

Michael, I know this equation has no answer
e^x=0
But if we use the Taylor series of the function, we will have a polynomial whose degree is infinity
x^(infinity) +....+x/2!+x/1!+1=0
I know that the fundamental theorem of algebra requires that this infinity has an answer But on the other hand, the equation should not have an answer Why is it like this?Shouldn't we use the Taylor series?

MortezaSabzian-dbsl