Jury in Elizabeth Holmes Trial Says It’s Unable to Reach Verdict on 3 Counts

preview_player
Показать описание
Anne Makovec talks to Stanford Law Professor David Sklansky about the latest developments in the Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial (1-3-2021)
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The verdicts should be unanimous - Guilty.

davidellis
Автор

If they find her not guilty, the world would be shocked.

garygagnon
Автор

One of the counts include "faking her voice."

untouchablex
Автор

What's the problem jury? 😕 my gosh!

diggorypat
Автор

Is she still laughing like a child? This girl is crazy.

Foxie
Автор

Can’t believe that so many investors fell for this Narc’s crap. And her pregnancy- wow. Such a manipulative typical step!

ShoshanaBrand
Автор

I’m not any legal expert, but this whole ugly drama has a fishy smell to it. Lock her up for the eight guilty counts. The other three disputed counts should continue to be deliberated and can be added later. The judge doesn’t seem to be buying it and told them already.

Also, …. Investigate all jurors for any suspicious Christmas ‘bonus’ that shows up in any of the jurors accounts. If found, lock them up too.
Unfortunately there was a baby involved. Probably another manipulation by her, but Evans can deal with raising the baby.

Rikkcas
Автор

She should come out as gender neutral, that puts her above most other people and may get a lesser sentence.

nedmerrill
Автор

Has anyone made this a movie yet? Or are they working on it

diggorypat