Military Expert Reveals Most DANGEROUS Fighter Jets

Air dominance lies at the core of contemporary warfare, but what's the secret to achieving it? Step one: acquire a fleet of cutting-edge fighter jets and deploy top-notch pilots. That's a strong starting point.

However, what truly characterizes an exceptional aircraft? What features should it have, and what weaponry must it wield to secure aerial superiority? Today, we delve into these questions.

Join us in this video to explore how our military experts evaluated some of the world's most advanced fighter jets.

#themilitaryshow

[pj]

The Su-27 has no business being on this list. Replace it with the Swedish Gripen and you're back on track.
I'd also put the F-15 Eagle 2 slightly* ahead of the Eurofighter... but the gap between those planes, and the Rafale, is so small, reordering them isn't egregious. You did forget the Super Hornet. I'd rank them pretty close to your list though:
10) Su-30
9) F-16V block 70/72
8) Gripen
7) Su-35
6) (a) Block iii Super Hornet
(b) Rafale F4
5) (a) F-15EX Eagle 2
(b) Eurofighter T3
4) Su-57
3) J-20
2) F-35
1) F-22

[ATKieren]

“This single seat aircraft” as your literally showing jets with two seats

[ATKieren]

not a mili tech guy but according to the comments this list needs a serious redo.

[Psi-Storm]

The Swedish Gripen is missing. The new Gripen E is probably fighting for place 6 with the French Rafale. The Russian and Chinese jets are also only as good as the rockets they carry. Nobody needs these planes for dogfighting. If the rockets can't compete with the west, the planes have no chance.

[montecorbit]

At 18:54
F-22 3D thrust vectoring....

Sorry, it only has 2D thrust vectoring....it can only go up and down, not side to side.

[MakeshiftMartyr]

The SU-57 has NOTHING on the F-22, it’s nowhere near comparable.

[marcellobo]

Swedish SAAB Jas Gripen didn't even make the top10! 😀

[fightingfalcon]

Don't forget the F-15E Strike Eagle and F-15EX Eagle II. Both types are fitted with General Electric F110-GE-129 turbofans (same employed by the F-16 Fighting Falcon).

[CKW]

The Gripen is definitely missing out of this list and better than many Russian plane.

My list is
1. F22
2. F35
3. F15
4. F16
5. Typhoon
6. Gripen
7. F18/Hornet
8. j20
9. Raf
10. SU 57 (due to production issues and no combat experience) but I would say SU27 of Su35 could be better as it's more reliable.

[badbattleaxe]

It’s crazy that the F 35 is probably going to outlive me. You never see aircraft in the sky that long other than big old bombers.

[toddbrackett]

Why did you count the SU-27 & SU-35 as two different aircraft on this list but all variants of the F-16 as one aircraft?
Why should the SU-35 be considered a generation 4++ (whatever this means) if it lacks data-fusion and AESA Radar capabilities?

The F-16 Block 70/72 has an RCS 10x smaller than the SU-35, it can employ almost any of the world's most advanced weapons, it has an Advanced AESA and data-fusion capabilities, why would this aircraft rate below the SU-35?

[meglok]

No Grippen, no F-18 Super, but the SU-27 and 35 are mentioned? Laughable.

[danielbarnes]

The raptor originally only had 2d thrust vectoring to improve it's angle of attack profile, haven't heard anything about 3d vectoring yet...

[Anonymous-zudh]

"the F-16 can carry all modern missiles". Nope it currently cannot carry the meteor, which is going to be troublesome for Ukraine, as they want the meteor missile too. The gripen is fully meteor compatible though.

[joshvanguard]

Why is it you keep calling these single seat fighters yet you immediately show a picture of 2 seat aircraft ...🤷🏼‍♂️

[dgarcesu]

"In design it looks a little like the F-22 Raptor"
*proceeds to show the F-35*

[joblanjouw]

Where are the f/a18 super hornet, J16 and the fc31?

[dogbert]

Think the F22 ceiling is 65, 000 ft not 50k.

[jerrykahn]

The Russians only have 15 SU-57s in service and the engines are over 50 year old technology and prone to fire problems. Those engines are based upon the ones in both the SU-35 and the SU-27. The Chinese J-20 on the other hand are currently using the WS-10G engine, which are reported to be vastly underpowered. The replacement for the WS-10 is the WS-15 which is reported to be having reliability issues in the demonstrator Aircraft into which they have been installed.😊

[hum]

I am sure that the typhoon is Mach 2 and a flight ceiling of over 60, 000 ft. Please correct me if I am wrong and the gripen seems to be missing.