Delhi HC Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost On Litigant Challenging Justice Chandrachud's Appointment As CJI

preview_player
Показать описание
Delhi HC Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost On Litigant Challenging Justice Chandrachud's Appointment As CJI

Also Watch:

In a significant development, the Delhi High Court today dismissed a public interest litigation challenging the appointment of newly sworn in Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud with Rs. 1 lakh costs.
Justice DY Chandrachud was sworn in as the 50th Chief Justice of India on November 9 that is on Wednesday. took over from former CJI UU Lalit who retired from office on November 8
A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad called it a "publicity interest litigation" while dismissing the petition.

#delhihighcourt #uulalit #dychandrachud #chiefjusticeofindia #publicinterestlitigation

LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
We are into fact based legal journalism.
Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.

Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Contempt of court cost Rs.1 but questioning appointment of CJI costs Rs.1Lakh.

Dek rahe ho Binod 😂

Rajesh_Raj
Автор

Applauded action..that culprit must be serve in jail 🙏

akashsingh
Автор

Judiciary can't shut public mouth like this, no one is above the constitution and law. No one has right to declare something wrong without proper enquiry, petitioner just wanted to conduct a enquiry on the allegations made by him, there is nothing wrong in this. Court should have treated the CJI as an individual everyone is equal in eyes of law but HC crossed all limits and imposed fine on the petitioners. First of all a fine can be imposed by HC only when the concerned person file a defamation case against the petitioners but here HC behaved as a spokesperson of the CJI.
RIP Indian Judiciary

rohanadhikari
Автор

Not maintainable in the first place in delhi high court...delhi high court itself lies within the administrative control and supervision of the apex court....the division bench being subordinate to the CJI cannot even touch the matter at the first place....RPI to the lawyer who filed it

malayswapnil
Автор

Pali in India for buddha not sanskrit.

mintusaren
Автор

Desdrohi feku Modi, BJP hatau, des bachau

rabiroy