The Comparison of Apache vs Indian built LCH. who wins ?

The Comparison of Apache vs. Indian built LCH. who wins ?

The two helicopter which known for its significant multifunction's capacity that makes it more deadly superior for war. Apache was introduced in the year 1981 in US air force whereas LCH was made its first flight on 2010. for more info watch video do let us know your thoughts about both helicopters.

#LCH #apache #comparison #aircraftvsaircraft #defense #helicopter #fighter helicopter #USA #India #IAF #HAL #hindustanaeronauticlimited

Boeing AH-64 Apache (Aircraft Model), Helicopter (Invention), Combat, in flight, in action, rockets, missiles, Machine Gun (Invention), destruction, blast, explosion, shooting, firing, takeoff, landing, flying, Aviation (Industry), military, military videos, military training, military exercise, armed forces, soldiers, military tribute, troops, Troop (Armed Force), Soldier (Profession), gun tape, gun camera, blue sky,
アパッチ, Apache, AH-64, AH-64D アパッチ・ロングボウ, AH-64D Apache Longbow, アパッチ・ロングボウ, 攻撃ヘリコプター, attack helicopter, ヘリコプター, 兵器搭載, Weapons Load, 砲撃, Gunnery, アメリカ陸軍, US Army, 自衛隊, 軍事, ミリタリー, Military, AH-64D

[jama]

Wow 😮 very impressive respect India 🇮🇳 from Somalia 🇸🇴✌🏽

[hhputube]

Go India!!! Respect from the USA here! You'll need the right tools for the right job and the right environment!

[VELS]

LCH is made for high altitude Himalayan struggled to hit the 7km high altitude Pakistanis position with Russian attack helicopters with load in kargil war 1999 that's made LCH for its own interest ....Apache is heavy attack helicopter

[starman]

when you look at price diffrence, LCH is a true futuristic beast, also you forgot to maintain LCH has less radar cross section as compared to apache which makes LCH more safe from enemy missiles, also in the video service ceiling of Apache is shown wrong its less than 20k feet, The only reason India made LCH because Indian needs to monitor over the Himalayas and LCH can fly over peaks of the top mountains but Apache cant do that at all.

[KaustabhSinghaRoy]

LCH is designed for high mountains and it is a king there definitely on plains apache excel

[jacksonteller]

Both have a different design due to the difference between the tasks they are meant for. The Apache was designed as a heavy survivable helicopter to stem the red hordes on the plains of Europe. The LCH as a light attack and reconnaissance helicopter for high altitude and hot/humid conditions.

[deepaksinghrajawat]

Apache indeed a beast and awesome capabilities but in mountain warfare at high altitude LCH would perform better

[blackpigeon]

Apache is a warthog on the battlefield but lch is designed to attack on mountains as in 1999 kargil war india realised that they require a attack helicopter for such areas.
Both play different roles

[j__c]

Lch is light heli and apache is medium heli but performance according to requirement of lch is 🔥🔥

[siddhinaik]

Lch is light attack heli and Apache is medium. LCH was designed to fight in the mighty himalayas where the average peak height is around 6.5 km.

[ashleysilver]

Just look at the price difference Apach is 2.5 times costlier. Im sure LCH can be fitted with various bombs and guns. LCH also flies higher and further. Not much in the speed department just a little faster is the Apache. I believe the LCH wins purely because of its flight ceiling and range and cost. Armaments can be added to both.

[mrarun]

The error in the weight of these helicopters is in the commentary at about 2:50. It should be the opposite of what was said since Apache is significantly heavier than LCH. Otherwise, this is a good video 👍🏼

[vishvendrasingh]

Both are different category helicopter, both are designed for totally different type of warfare..

[sasha]

LCH primarily is developed for high altitude missions. You can call it china centric. As tensions flair between both countries, LCH is becoming more relevant. Galwan clash has changed everything. China has clearly chosen a path and India (after years of warning signs) knows who is the real enemy.

[herearewe]

Dude Apache is heavier and it is a Medium weight heavy support helicopter while LCH is a lightweight and support helicopter designed considering the Himalayan terrain in consideration.

[leonus]

Lch is lighter than apache
That's why it's called lch

[mohammadabusarwar]

The Apache is a heavy attack helicopter where as the HAL LCH is a light attack helicopter. So comparing the two doesn't make any sense.

[ericbana]

I'm an Indian and im gonna be honest. The LCA is no match to the Apache, but its a marvellous effort and it's going to give us a much more valuable lesson. Although, India has already bought a few Apaches, I hope we spend more on research and improve the Prachand on the same levels of the legendary Apache, esp, the long bow variant. I've been watching and an absolute fan of the Apache and to know that its very much possible that we may build something similar, it's an incredible feeling.

[santoshkumarsahoo]

Apache is heavyweight and LCH is lightweight, maintainance cost is very high in case of Apache, while LCH can do the same that an Apache can do with a low budget and low maintainance. LCH is designed for high altitude warfare in Himalayan region, in high altitude war Apache is less effective because of it's weight.

[smartbaba]

Both are good but made for different purposes.
Indian one was made for high Altitude war zone in Himalayas.
US one was mde for multiple role.