Mastering Spearman Rank Correlation Analysis in R

preview_player
Показать описание
// Spearman correlation in R //

I'll show the details that will enhance your data analysis with specifying the correct alternative hypothesis, requesting a different confidence interval - if needed and how to classify the magnitude of your correlation aka. effect.

For the latter I will also refer to Cohen (1992): A Power Primer and the thresholds provided, mainly applicable for the behavioral sciences.

📚 Literature
===========
📚 Cohen, J. (1992): Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological bulletin, pp. 155-159.

⏰ Timestamps:
==============
0:00 Introduction
0:09 Requirements for the Spearman rank correlation coefficient
0:27 One-sided vs. two-sided testing
1:18 Interpretation: I) p value
1:51 Interpretation: II) correlation coefficient r
2:08 Interpretation: III) effect size classification

If you have any questions or suggestions regarding the Spearman rank correlation in R, please use the comment function. Thumbs up or down to decide if you found the video helpful.

#useR #statorials

Support channel? 🙌🏼
===================

Thank you for your support! ♥
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks, i have to correlate one normal distributed variable (antibody concentration) and other non-normal variable (percentage of killed bacteria), thus spearman correlation is an option because my data are not completely normal and some data is repeated (tie data). A question, i need to transform my raw data variable into ranks before the test? or the the raw data is transformed by default, if i understand well, when you say that both of your variables are at the ordinary scale that means that you are not using your raw data, your previously transformed into ranks?.

davidalfonsoriveraruiz