Understanding Why static constexpr Variables Require Separate Definitions in C++11

Explore the reasons behind why `static constexpr` variables in C++11 must be defined outside of their class declarations for compliance with the One Definition Rule.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: c++11: Why a in-class initialization of a static constexpr not a definition?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why static constexpr Variables Require Separate Definitions in C++11

C++ is a powerful programming language known for its rich feature set and complex rules. Among these is the treatment of static constexpr variables, particularly regarding their initialization within class definitions. This raises an interesting question: Why is an in-class initialization of a static constexpr variable not considered a definition?

In this post, we'll explore the One Definition Rule (ODR) and how it affects the use of static constexpr variables in C++11. We’ll provide a structured explanation, ensuring clarity for developers navigating these complexities.

The Core Issue: One Definition Rule (ODR)

The essence of C++2003 and beyond revolves around the One Definition Rule:

ODR Overview: The ODR states that there can only be one definition of each non-inline non-member variable and static member variable across the entire program. This rule is crucial for maintaining consistency and avoiding conflicts in larger codebases.

Example Scenario

Consider the following class definition:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, a is declared within the class Test but does not fulfill the requirements of a definition. Although it might seem initialized, it does not satisfy ODR due to its limitation in multiple translation units.

Why Isn't the In-Class Initialization Considered a Definition?

The Problem of Multiple Translation Units

When a header file is included in multiple translation units (which is common in larger applications), if the static constexpr variable were treated as a definition, it could lead to multiple definitions of the same variable.

This would violate ODR, causing undefined behavior during linkage.

The Solution: External Definition

To comply with ODR, static constexpr variables need an external definition.

Here's how you define a correctly outside the class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This externalizes the definition of a, allowing the variable to be stored in one place while still being accessible throughout the program.

Changes in C++17

It's worth noting that since C++17, the language introduced inline variables. This allows variables to be defined within class definitions without the need for separate external definitions. The inline keyword essentially explains to the compiler that the variable might be included in multiple translation units, and it should only treat it as a single definition.

Conclusion

In summary, the restriction on in-class initialization of static constexpr variables in C++11 is rooted in the One Definition Rule. Understanding this helps avoid pitfalls related to variable definitions in complex applications. By defining your static constexpr variables outside the class, you remain compliant with ODR, ensuring a smooth development experience.

Now that you have a clearer understanding of this essential aspect of C++, you can apply this knowledge to your coding practices for safer and more efficient programming.