3- Probability Axioms

Random experiments, probability axioms.

[johng]

Thanks is NOT enough. Very well explained: Simple, clear, and straight to the point. Thanks in a million.

[ryandavis]

Very well done, sir. This was exceptionally helpful material to consider after reading the section (Probability and Statistics 8th - Devore) and not fully understanding the proof for Axiom 3. Thank you and I will follow for more of your insight. You are a good teacher. Thanks again.

Ryan D.

[simplicityfx]

In section e and d the sets A and B inside veen diagram aren't disjoint sir, cuz when two sets are intersecting there is probability of having at least one element in common.

[giovannigrassi]

In the problem c), u say that 1-X, said that X>0, must be positive. But the first axiom, as u wrote it, says that it has to be >=0, but it could be 2 for example... I suppose that the first axiom also says that it has to be <=1, in that case in the problem c) u have not to demonstrate nothing, given the axiom needed... right?

[setha]

Thank you for removing the pretzel in my brain

[ricky-leedaniels]

He speaks to fast, considering one has to interpret his accent first.