SDXL 1.0 Speed Test How Fast Is ComfyUi vs Invoke ai vs Automatic1111?

preview_player
Показать описание
SDXL 1.0 Speed Test How Fast Is ComfyUi vs Invoke ai vs Automatic1111? (UPDATED VIDEO TO COME)
I was very curious to compare these 3 platforms generation speeds for Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 and I was quite surprised from the results. I tested 768x1024 and 1024x1024 on all 3 platforms keeping the settings consistent through out. Now this wasn't a advanced benchmark test but it did give me a better idea on how each platform performs in comparison.

⏲Time Stamps
0:00 How I ran the tests
0:41 System Specs
1:19 Auto1111 768x1024
1:52 Auto1111 1024x1024
2:37 Invoke ai 768x1024
3:08 Invoke ai 1024x1024
3:36 ComfyUi 768x1024
4:01 ComfyUi 1024x1024
4:30 Benchmark Summary
5:12 Final thoughts

**Disclaimer Affiliate Links Below**

📸 Gear I use

🎵 Epidemic Sound

🔦 Find us on:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hope you enjoyed this fun little test! I'm curious to know how fast these platforms run on your system? Let me know your specs and general speeds!

MonzonMedia
Автор

Thank you for producing this video, it was very helpful for me
I am from Iran

aliusfzh
Автор

Thanks for theses metric, really cool to know

hleet
Автор

You have preview enabled on A1111, which means you have VAE decoding and rendering every few iterations. This changes the speed quite a lot on older hardware. Just deactivate preview and it should be as quick as the others.

DoubleBob
Автор

Comfy is faster for me, I'm on a 4GB 1050 ti (I don't use XL but just SD 1.5) and Comfy is much faster. The problem is how complicated everything is to get set up and it seems that using ControlNet in Comfy is much slower than in A1111.

_grnchh
Автор

I believe the couple seconds difference between comfy and invoke can be attributed to the preview, none in comfy, quite a few intermediate images in invoke

SBaldo
Автор

Is there a setting somewhere in InvokeAI equivalent to AUTOMATIC1111's Clip Skip ?

ВикторияКузьмина-мз
Автор

Thanks for that Video 👌. If you can, try comparing the speeds of even more programs.

internetceo
Автор

Thank you for the great comparison video! I've definitely seen that ComfyUi speeds are much faster than Automatic1111 in my own tests. I wonder how Fooocus holds up in a test like this?

diva
Автор

aha. you are the Playground sensei! I have subscribed, to both. thank you for the tutorials

gatotboediman
Автор

hello I'm still a beginner and still learning SDXL, if I use Ryzen 5600x with VGA gtx 1660s which one do you think I should use, is it automatic 1111 comfy or invoke?

iqbalfajry
Автор

This video will need reevaluating very shortly as new A1111 RC 1.6 build has vastly improved its SDXL method to be more competitive.

MrAsmadaseggs
Автор

I have just six Gigabyte VRAM and I had to run on the lowram comment on automatic1111(one picture needs round about 8 minutes) to get any picture on SDXL i'm going to try today if it's still necessary or if I can use midram. If that's not working I will finally try ConfiUI

Grimmona
Автор

i usually generate images in ComfyUI and then do afterwork in A1111

jorgennorstrom
Автор

AUTOMATIC1111 v1.6.0-RC is almost fast as comfyUI for me, its three times faster than AUTOMATIC1111 v1.5, my generation time went from 57seconds to 17seconds for 1024X1024 generations..

udappkuma
Автор

Can you redo this in least update for now day's

Heldn
Автор

How is Ho Chi Minh appear on your intro?

rickykngo
Автор

I guess with more vram the difference between these will become smaller.

fixelheimer
Автор

Seems it's wrongly tested... what about VRAM?

jaroslavstreit
Автор

Thanks for the video it's nice to see how the different software affects render time on your system! However, without knowing your rig specs CPU GPU RAM it really isn't as helpful as it could be. That would be most helpful! (NOTE: I messed up and missed where you did exactly that. My apologies and thanks to the people that quickly pointed out my mistake.)

DasLooney