AMC DEBT SHOULD BE ZERO TODAY! 🚨THIS WAS EASY TO ACCOMPLISH 💯✅

preview_player
Показать описание
AMC CEO COULD HAVE MADE US 10 BILLION 💵CASH TWICE! EASILY! 💵
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I suggest we start a petition to remove AA as ceo

JonathanIngbretson
Автор

I just pray that God gives the judge the vision to see through the smoke and mirrors AA created to try to steal our hard earned money and that she not only make everything right for us but also gives us the right to sue that slime ball.

JoseVasquez-eplr
Автор

AMC can beat VW squeeze esaly 🚀🚀🚀📈📈📈💎💎💎🦍🦍❤10K no less 🦍📈🚀💎🥂🥂

xxfluperxx
Автор

At this point I think the only hope we have left lies with what the judge decides !

peterlee
Автор

And he could have offered AMC holders first dibs on that 500 million new AMC, but you are right, it was never about the company

donlord
Автор

YES Even offer the Shares to Retail First.

tommy
Автор

who wants to do what France did to blackrock. No one cause Americans aren’t about that life .

sirtone
Автор

Vote AA Out, his moves have gone against us and the squeeze

josevelasco
Автор

AMC attitude insisting on dilution and lowering Shorts by 90 % is clear indication their primary goal is rescuing short sellers, I believe if AMC is interested in generating income it is extremely obvious and simple as they already have 10M retailers that any time they can ask for a $20 donation would generate 2 Billion, But what they are doing is angering and trapping Retailers. If retailers lose, then they lose them permanently. If Retail profit, then they got a lifeloog faithful customers. My opinion only

rcomhatcher
Автор

It was dilution, pure and simple. I was called all kinds of names when I suggested this when we all heard about it. It was made super obvious when our AMC lost value after the issuance. And people were still missing his butt and drinking the Kool-Aid. He even named it APE! If that's not laughing in someone's face, then...

Anyway, we have at least one person of influence and power on our side. Let's hope they don't somehow get to get too. It's also good to see other retail fighting through letters. Maybe it won't be enough, but it's still good to see and it raises awareness about the scam that is the stock market.

johnw.
Автор

This is the Truth. I've been thinking the same thing about all this for a while now. Mr. Naked Shorts How about some popcorn. Lol. Why do we have a CEO that is making all the wrong moves 🤔. Do we have a mule in the office ??? Would make sense. You have my vote for CEO. Keep up the good work and Keep posting!

aaronceleketic
Автор

This is all worst case scenario, which could be true. I'm hoping he is using the tossed APE shares to contractually force them to cover a specified amount of shares by a certain date. But sadly he gifted them to prolong investor agony because AA seems to be a sadist.

johntsingis
Автор

What's stopping us from having a fund. Doing the same thing. Having control over how the funds are spent. Issue shares only to Share holders. Once the A fund is funded, a transaction would be taken place for AMC shares, that AMC share hold approved amount. This Amount invested by each share holder could be different. The main Objective is the same.

tommy
Автор

When do you think a short squeeze will happen? Before or after 4/27? I think with this high CTB it is very possible before 4/27 so it can be this week or next week

MrLoinguyen
Автор

No matter how you look at it Adam Aron has not been with his investors from day one. He has a bank sitting on his board which is a conflict of interest. He has no real count of shares and Market Watch says there are about 7.5 billion synthetic shares not counted. People in other countries never not received their APE shares and on and on. This is highway robbery of retail investors and manipulation not to mention possible lying to the Judge. My opinion.

penelopenicholas
Автор

Someone is not a “conspiracy theorist” if they expect these glaring inconsistencies to be answered - or at the very least even addressed - in the “investigative report”.

agee
Автор

Hine sight that's the better way But us retail investors didn't want to dilute the stock we would not have approved that dilution. I personal think his fortune that he made throughout his career are probably with hedge funds thus he stands to loose more if this stock squeezes. As a rich person where else would he put his money other than in funds.

grayerdays
Автор

He could have used the 4+ billion extra to buy back shares afterwards too and reduced the float back down to close to what it was prior to the issue.

debbiejones
Автор

He could have bought shares and ALSO given us a dividend too.

debbiejones
Автор

I believe we need to write the judge (I already mailed my letter) that AMC retailers own AMC multiple times over. I believe APE is basically a way for AMC management to take back the company without paying a dime as they will have 3 times the legal float shares after RS while before RS they allowed over sell of the shares that based on the float then Retail owns it and can fire all managements. It is not our fault that we owned the float as the management inactivity and coverup the over selling of its shares made retail the legitimate owners. Management wants to take back the AMC without paying retail. That is my opinion as I see it. Now how to handle that we need a court and share counts. This should be a lesson that selling fake shares can result in loss of a company to either those sold the fake (bankrupts) or those purchased them. Share counts is a must to determine who owns the company.

rcomhatcher