Migg's Reward - Inside No. 9: Episode 3 Preview - BBC Two

#bbc

[juliebebbington]

This was the best episode couldn't guess the ending. Quite sad and thought provoking, never miss anything by these two or Mark Gatiss pure genius

[ClementineQuasem]

Gerri “ It smells of pumps in here “ - Tom ‘ Trainer ones ☝️ or bottom ones ? ‘ 👟 🩲 🌬 💨😅😂🤣

[michaelangus]

I started watching the show last night and I'm completely hooked, it was too funny for words 

[Wilson]

Last night's episode was perfection in every single way ... Got to love our dark British humour. 

[nitram_nosnibor]

These two are English treasures in their acting, faultless!

[gazpro]

Awesome, episode 2 was the funniest although from a drama perspective this one was the best. I can't wait for series 2 on the 26th of March.

[brainy]

Still no YouTubers doing the explanations for this show. What a shame!

[Picnicl]

People might not realise that it still leaves unknowable answers - there is a point where Migg instantly reappears. So Migg is definitely a figment of Tom's imagination. That means that Migg's 'death' is also a figment of Tom's imagination. That means that Stevie's reaction to Migg's death is also a figment of Tom's imagination. That means that either Stevie, or Stevie''s appearances, are a figment of Tom's imagination or, at least, certain apperances by Stevie were figments of Tom's imagination. And I suspect that it is actually possible for Gerri to be alive, possible for all her entrances to be real, and that she is correct that Migg doesn't exist (remember that she says that she can't actually see a tramp when Tom first says he sees one?). But if Migg doesn't exist why does the camera allow the viewer to be an independent part of the madness by independently seeing Migg? Deliberately vague or just too surreally open-ended to actually be properly logically clever? I see no particular clues of when we are definitely seeing reality or when we are definitely seeing imagination. I think.. I think it's sloppy or cynical plotting that was either accidentally or deliberately misleading to the public about what actually could have happened. In other words, the 'twist' could not have happened as what the viewer saw purported to show it happened as.

[xiao]

THIS EPISODE SCARRED ME TO THE END. OH MY GOD. IM SHAKING WHILE TYPING THIS JESUS CHRIST

[superhenri]

This episode and the first one were 👌seriously. Sometimes you just gotta love briatain

[davejones]

Steady on, Ive just give u 40 quid!!!! Ducking genius writing

[christschinwon]

Shockingly brilliant episode but the strongest image I was left with is Gemma Arterton in full Lucy Landgirl garb complete with nylon stockings and garter belt