How Volcanoes Affect Earth's Climate Over Millions of Years 360° I NOVA I PBS

In this 360° video from the Sierra Nevadas' Long Valley Caldera and Antarctica's Mount Erebus, see how volcanoes belch carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere, which has slowly changed Earth's climate for millions of years.

#PBSPolarExtremes

Production Intern: Shantal Riley
Edited by: Arlo Pérez & Lorena Lyon
Narrated by: Caitlin Saks
Senior Digital Producer: Ari Daniel
NOVA Labs Editorial Director: David Condon
Music: APM

© WGBH Educational Foundation 2020

[amberpowell]

my jaw is on the FLOOR. This is the first time I've ever seen a 360-degree video, and I am in AWE. THIS IS SO SO COOL OMG

[IronBelH]

The short ones all leave me wanting it to go on. If there is more to say, there is no reason to hold back!

[forknowledge]

I thought yellowstone was one of the largest supervocanoes.

[doobidoo]

CO2 at 0.04% is a 2, 500th part of the atmosphere. That means to warm the climate by just 1"C carbon dioxide molecules must capture 2, 500"C of heat energy. That is of course impossible and it breaks the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. 

Methane at 0.00017% is a 600, 000th of the atmosphere so it's even more impossible. To cause 1° of heating methane would have to capture 600, 000°C of heat energy. Problematic as this is over a hundred times hotter than the surface of the sun.

Methane also breaks down in sunlight.

To get round the obvious flaw, NASA and even Nobel Prize winning physicists have expounded 'accumulated heat' as the explanation how CO2 is able to warm the atmosphere. They claim that over hundreds of years CO2 has captured heat energy and this heat has 'accumulated' to produce a serious warming effect.

Accumulated heat whilst sounding a reasonable explanation of how heat can build up is rather nothing more than gobbledygook. In fact it shows those using such arguments do not even understand what heat is.

When we measure temperature we are measuring the heat energy a thing is losing. In short heat is a measurement of flow, the transfer of heat energy and this will always be in the direction towards the colder. For this reason a thing can never 'accumulate heat' in the way those advocating CO2 climate change describe. The temperature of a body is the measure of heat output, it can never be greater than the measure of heat input. Output = input. When a thing is warmed it is heated to an equivalent of the heat input. If this input is not maintained it will cool. Those that propose that heat can build up to be hotter than the total measure of heat input at a given time either do not understand what heat is or are being deliberately misleading. To illustrate, an object being heated by a flame can never become hotter than that flame, it's temperature cannot rise inexorably to the temperature of the sun for instance. Heat cannot be accumulated. When we think about it common sense tells us this must be the case.

Imagine a river. It's flow is not water but heat. The river is being fed from a point a 2, 500th the size of the river's overall diameter. The flow at the point the river is being fed from must be 2, 500 times faster. So if the flow of the river is 1 the flow at the point source must be 2, 500. Heat cannot be accumulated because heat, like a river, must continually flow. The measure of heat is the measure of its loss.

There is no getting round this. Accumulated heat is nonsense.

Fraction elements have fractional effects. We understand this everyday as scale and proportion.

When confronted with these contradictions 'the butterfly effect' is sited allowing fractional elements to be attributed major effects. This too is nonsense and deeply unscientific. The flap of a butterfly wing in Brazil cannot cause a hurricane in Texas just as the stamping of a foot will not cause the moon to crash into the earth. All processes must be measurable and proportionate. The butterfly effect is magical thinking.

Similarly, over complexity has been introduced to support man made climate change. This gives the impression of evidence whilst burying obvious contradictions of logic under a mountain of incomprehensible information. Opaque terms such as 'solar forcing' are used to add further unnecessary muddle, in this case the word 'comparison' works much better.

Man made climate change is a cover story. It has been constructed to hide real changes taking place to the Sun, Earth and all the planets in the solar system as the electromagnetic polarity resets.

Like all the planets, Earth's electromagnetic field is weakening. This weakening is accelerating. As the field weakens more damaging solar particle radiation is able to reach the atmosphere, ozone is destroyed.

Ozone thinning is directly observable, in clear skies you will see an unnaturally bright sun. It's why the moon seems so much brighter. Under these conditions the pain felt when looking at the sun is not only from the increase in visible light but the much larger increase in infrared. 

Look up at the sky and you will see a range of geoengineering operations in progress to mitigate this damage, these include chemtrail induced cloud or hazing, geometric ripple patterns (HAARP), bizarre and unnatural cloud formations.

The collapse of the electromagnetic fields mean climate change will increase and get much much worse. Harmful radiation will scorch plants, destroy crops. Electromagnetic deterioration will cause earthquakes, seismic activity, rivers to run dry, finally electronic devices will burn out, blackouts, no electricity. Nuclear war will be used to conceal the levels of increased radiation. Three years before the reversal is complete the inner planets Venus and Mercury will develop tails that will spiral back towards the Sun. Of course by then geoengineering will be used to create permanent cloud cover, in part to conceal such an alarming spectacle but also to reduce the damaging effects of increased solar radiation.

Throughout this period of collapse man made climate change will be used as the popular explanation. Descent will not be tolerated. A variety of strategies are already being deployed to impose authoritarian government in what will be a rather orgiastic cull of population. Collapse of the economic system likely this year and the prelude to the introduction of digital currencies.

The inevitable culmination of pole reversal is micronova, something that our Sun does at regular intervals of thousands of years. As the Sun's electromagnetic field reaches total collapse the Sun will micronova. Actually micronova represents solar reset as the electromagnetic fields of the Sun and planets restores. There will be survivors but in all likelihood most will perish either before or during the micronova itself.

Of course you may consider this far too incredible and horrific a prospect. Compared to the CO2 narrative it seems exceptionally bleak.

I am putting this information out as it is important not because I am interested in endless debate. I am extremely familiar with the mainstream narrative.

Micronova likely 2033.

All these observations are my own and have not been lifted from third parties. Furthermore, the figures quoted are all checkable so please do check.

Please be aware of organized attempts to dismiss this comment including:
- Irrelevant questions and attempts to confuse. This will include misdirection to mainstream narratives.
- Closing-down questions and thought by deferring to 'experts'.
- Counter accusation.
- Contradictory statements that are not supported.
- Condescension, abuse and accusation.

[tsnmproductions]

Our LORD ALMIGHTY is RAINING down fiery DEATH !
CALLING ALL THE PEOPLE ON EARTH, STOP UNDERESTIMATING GOD'S POWER AND REPENT, REPENT AND REPENT ! THE END OF TIMES ARE HERE !