Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services vs Palo Alto Next-Generation Firewall

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, we compare the Cisco ASA firewall with FirePower and the Palo Alto Next-Gen Firewall. We cover:

-The differences between Palo Alto and Cisco ASA firewalls
-The features and benefits of both solutions for businesses of all sizes
-How well each system scales, key features, shortcomings, and associated costs
-Choosing a solution that provides the best protection, ease of deployment, and simple maintenance

This webinar was originally presented on March 31, 2016.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This was a very informative video, it would be nice to see this rerecorded for 2018.

StevenMH
Автор

I don't think you went into the NGFW features enough. This was a firewall comparison and not a security comparison and doesn't actually tell me anything I couldn't read on a spec sheet

wlmartin
Автор

Now we are in 2018, so, the recents models Cisco Firepower are intended to replace the legacy Cisco ASA FirePower?

JoferM
Автор

great comparison. thanks and keep it coming plzzzz

aliassaf
Автор

Maybe out of point question, but somebody please shed light- Is Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN or IPSec VPN?

shraddhashinde
Автор

Haven't Sophos and Fortinet been doing this forever?

dizkonekid
Автор

Wouldn't it have been better to compare a firepower NGFW such as the Cisco 4100 series device to the equivalent PA? appreciate certain ASA functionality is lacking however that's being addressed and it's more inline with the direction Cisco is headed.

If you thought Cisco enjoyed taking your money, PA takes it to the next level and beyond.

jasonpb
Автор

Turned it off after you said that ASA/Firepower is easy to use.

JustinHoMi
Автор

DUDE!!!
When it comes to GOOD Firewalls....
You name them all and FORGET...CHECKPOINT !??? :-/

droidcrasher
Автор

It took you 45 minutes to read a 10 minute google search

VENIfromRUST
Автор

The company is called Palo Alto networks, not palo alto

wlmartin
Автор

Palo Alto support sucks, using it for last year and moving to Cisco.

rickshow
Автор

Cisco is better. I say this because Cisco will most likely have more appliances to further compliments each appliances capabilities and features. Yea it cost money. But good shit costs.

cocotwins
Автор

Being that you did this video in late 2016 you didnt mention the latest Cisco offering... UNFORTUNATELY, 9300 and 4100 as well as FMC, SNORT and FTD.... You need to do more work before you put together such an insufficient video.

toolate