Understanding Abstract Classes, Polymorphism in C+ + : Calling Pure Virtual Methods

Explore how to effectively call pure virtual methods within abstract classes in C+ + . Learn about design best practices to achieve polymorphism without compromising code quality.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Abstract Classes, Polymorphism C+ + - Calling pure virtual method in another function

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Abstract Classes, Polymorphism in C+ + : Calling Pure Virtual Methods

In the world of C+ + programming, particularly when working with Object-Oriented Programming (OOP), understanding abstract classes and polymorphism is crucial for designing flexible and maintainable applications. A common question that arises is how to effectively call pure virtual methods within abstract classes. This guide will explore this topic in detail, offering clear explanations and design suggestions to help both beginners and seasoned developers alike.

The Problem

Let's start by examining a scenario involving an abstract base class and its derived classes. Here’s a simplified representation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the above example, we have an abstract class named NodeSubElementEnforceType. It contains a pure virtual function getType() which must be implemented by any derived classes. The purpose of the performChecks() method is to call the getType() function.

Derived Classes Example

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup, both BNode and CNode are derived from NodeSubElementEnforceType and provide their own implementations of the getType() method.

Storing Derived Class Objects

You might want to create a collection of these derived class objects using a container, such as a vector:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Iterating Through Objects

Now you might be wondering if you can iterate over the objects in the vector and call the performChecks() method for each object:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Solution

Will This Work?

Yes, this approach would work as intended. When you invoke performChecks(), it will call the appropriate getType() method depending on the actual object type (either BNode or CNode), thanks to C+ + 's dynamic polymorphism mechanisms.

Design Consideration

However, there is a crucial design consideration: using raw pointers in a vector is generally not recommended. Instead, consider alternative options such as:

Smart Pointers: Utilize std::shared_ptr or std::unique_ptr to manage memory automatically and avoid memory leaks.

Example with std::shared_ptr:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Boost Pointer Containers: If applicable, you might explore using Boost libraries, which provide additional options for managing collections of pointers safely.

Virtual Method Calls

Another important point is whether it’s acceptable to call a virtual method from within another method in a base class. Yes, it is perfectly fine to do so when designed with OOP principles in mind. This allows great flexibility since the specific behavior of getType() can vary based on the object's runtime type.

Conclusion

In summary, calling pure virtual methods in another function within abstract classes in C+ + is a fundamental aspect of achieving polymorphism. By clearly understanding how these components interact, you can design a robust OOP architecture. Ensure you use modern practices such as smart pointers to enhance memory safety and overall code quality. If you implement these practices, you'll find your designs not only work but are also much easier to maintain and extend in the future!