Lecture 18: 'Hydrogen' and its Discontents

preview_player
Показать описание
MIT 8.04 Quantum Physics I, Spring 2013
Instructor: Allan Adams

In this lecture, Prof. Adams continues the discussion on hydrogen atoms. Runge-Lenz symmetry and relativistic corrections are discussed. Zeeman effect and Pauli exclusion principle are also covered.

License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is one of the BEST lecture in the entire series.

kunalverma
Автор

Amazing as always !!! The part of the lecture for the Lenz-Runge vector conservation was quite an mind-blowing one

Aragmatiki
Автор

FYI, the name of the mysterious conserved quantity is spelled as "Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector".

ikarienator
Автор

Every lecture blows my mind all over again

osherlerner
Автор

Great lectures, great teachers, great questions, great course! 
:v

WiremuWinitana
Автор

Pression = press ion
Energy= inner J
Volume= wall résistance
Etc.

imantidli
Автор

Question: around 39:25 the treatment is basically redefining Klein-Gordon, but that leads to some ill-defined negative energy states, doesn't it? So a full relativistic correction should require the Dirac equation, or is this treatment a sufficient treatment as an approximation?

szelau
Автор

I am currently looking into spin orbit coupling and trying to understand band splitting via spacial inversion symmetry breaking at interfaces causing electrical fields. A common explanation for the band splitting is that, as an electron moves through the electric field, it experiences an effective magnetic field in it’s rest frame due to relativistic effects. Now I know that this has to do with crystal momentum, and this lecture isn’t there yet, but does anyone have a resource that explains why electric fields cause magnetic fields in the rest frame of a moving charged particle? Thanks!

zacharythatcher
Автор

at 1:17:51 - factual correction: George Uhlenbeck is the father*-in-law* of Karen Uhlenbeck

atticusw
Автор

I would understand the Pauli Exclusion principle better but the fermions inside the neurons in my brain felt too squeezed when I tried to think about it.

CHistrue
Автор

Isn't a mistake in the relativist formulation of Kenetic energy?
 KE = mc²/((1-v²/c²)^(1/2)) - mc² ??

pierrecoldrey
Автор

40:50 what will be the implications if KE is corrected to higher powers of p using taylor series?

physicscurious-zqls
Автор

magnetic moment was dimensionally wrong there?
where does c come from in the denominator.

chitresguria
Автор

So you can't know all three components of angular momentum x, y, and z at the same time because if you measure in one direction, you automatically disturb its movement in at least on one other direction? Is that right? If you try to measure them simultaneously at least, I imagine. Since if it's not simultaneous, I don't see why you couldn't know the three just at different times..

leif
Автор

-WE HAVE THIS GIGANTIC DEGENERACY
-Everyone cool with this DEGENERACY?

Phrases that you can say in 804 and in an orgy.

viniciomonge
Автор

Please, Can someone tell me what references are using them of quantum mechanics?

mariariveraburgos
Автор

If u know a student is smart....shud the professor during lecture...worry about psychological..makeup...
..
The key....upmanship and chess Vs interest to just learn...know..curiosity can be a better guide...

nibussss
Автор

He is not teaching, just writing on the chalk board

ssleddens
Автор

What is wrong with him? Why he always in a rush to explain things? Better not to teach anything...

candoga