'Most Exciting Development' with QUANTUM FIELDS and GRAVITY | Neil Turok

Become a YouTube Member Here:

Support TOE:

Follow TOE:

Join this channel to get access to perks:

#science #physics

[benjaminbeard]

I wish we had about five more "Neil's" out there working on this stuff. We would have it wrapped up by Christmas.

[TV-xmps]

That image in the upper right corner is a scan of my thoughts at rest.

[liminally-spacious]

Awesome clip, definitely an exciting time to be alive.

[Chuck_Hooks]

We at least already have devices that can use Zero Point energy.
--Hecklefish

[James-wkym]

I wish more people could experiment with these advanced physics concepts and try to bring them in to engineering without being called crank/crackpot ect.
There is a theory that says the vacuum has infinite energy, great! what is wrong with trying to go and capture some?
There is an incredibly accurate theory called GR that tells you how matter and energy curve space time which then tells matter how to move, what is wrong with trying to engineer that metric?
Physically achieving either of these would instantly catapult humanity into a post scarcity age.

[mrhassell]

Very exciting! The Cavitation effect - P_local < P_value / σ = P_local − P_value | 1/2ρv^2 - OR - P_local > P_value - Self+1/2, in fluid dynamics, is similar to the restoring force, frequencies of acoustic properties and the fact that using ultrasonic waves, breaks the strong force of atomic bonds, with the nucleus rebinding instantly, creates a lot of thermal energy being released and that asymmetry violation, is exactly the right direction to find keys for vacuum energy's door.

[Usrnet]

Would it make sense to measure vacuum fluctuations quantities in a gravitational field and apart from it? Just to see if there is infinite energy or maybe more energy apart from a gravitational field and less fluctuations in a gravitational field.

[LBTennis]

Isn't this what Dr. Pias was essentially saying

[profman]

This is what dr Steven greer says and has been saying

[infnloopmusic]

I think this agrees and extends the theory that we describe anything outside of a wave function- we just become inaccurate at describing our reality. The oscillations themselves are the all-powerful fabric of the universe.

[milanpintar]

i love this answer, i might be around for TOE

[Killer_Kovacs]

Neither x or p can be zero because the particle should have a relativistic position and that position requires a portion of the particle's energy. If the particle has a "viewpoint" then it intrinsically has a position

[larscincaid]

The Universe is fractal.
There is no Beginning nor End.

Truth is the Infinite Void of Potentiality.

Carry on.

[Jamex]

I often speculate on a version of kaluza klein theory where instead of an extra compactified dimension it has an extra zero spin imaginary mass scalar field that is responsible for giving particles charge. This extra scalar field could also appear as a dimension zero field and presents interesting solutions to black holes without singularities, the double slit experiment, bell's inequality, quantum tunnelling, quantum entanglement and virtual particle interactions.

[charlesblithfield]

If this plays out I’m interested to know what the broader applications and implications will be. It seems simple but there are those assumptions…

[aychinger]

Well said:
There’s no wiggle room — either this picture is right or it’s wrong. Simplicity rules! I hope it’s true, fingers crossed. 🤞

[Necrozene]

Finally, we have what Edgar Allan Poe described as "unparticled matter" in Eureka.

[jugodevaca]

This is consistent with the idea that ‘the sum of all things’ would be considered a singularity. This would be the opposite horizon from the mirror at what we perceive as ‘the big bang.’

All things exist within this set of all sets, the philosophical ‘all.’ An individual thing exists in a vacuum, the philosophical ‘void.’ It is the comparison of a reduced set of things, some relativity, which demands context.

From the highest frame of reference this is a closed system at equilibrium. For any frame of reference within this system we assign some coordinate in some dimension above zero, following the potential path of least resistance between horizons within the singularity.

[Tripp]

Lynn McTaggart wrote about this in The Field, about a decade ago.

[triplec]

It seems that physicists, when confronted with infinity as a result, will usually find a way to 'renormalize' that infinity into something finite unless, of course, that infinity advances a particular line of reasoning. While I certainly respect Neil and believe his latest mirror universe idea is a big step forward, it also suffers from having to have an initial state of a universe that springs from a preexisting spacetime continuum that has quantum properties -- a huge something, not nothing. And now we need to be able to explain the existence of "infinite energy". You'll see many books and articles that try to explain the nature of space and time, but in the end, it's obvious that we understand neither. We don't understand the nature of dimensions outside of their mathematical representation. Why are there 3 spatial dimensions, or 11, or 567, or infinite? And what, really, is the time dimension and how does it relate to our perception of time? Did dimensions all come into existence at once or are they emergent? I'm not saying we should abandon our current lines of research and our speculative theories, but we would be well served, I think, if we paid more attention to understanding the most basic elements of our universe: space and time outside of their mathematical description. All of our current "theories" are based on assumptions about space and time and nothingness that may or may not be true. If, for instance, we were to find out that there is a 4th spatial dimension that was responsible for our perception of "time", the implication would be catastrophic for all the current models. Taking for granted the most basic elements of our universe seems a great gamble as well as a great conceit IMHO of course.