AI Detection Bypass: Uncovering the Only Method That Works! I Tried Them All!

In this video, I'm sharing with you my experience using different AI detection methods. I tested all of them and found the only one that really works!

▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:

................................................

▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
0:00 – introduction
0:37 – initial scores
1:39 – synonyms
2:08 – tone
2:46 – paraphrasing tools
3:06 – manual paraphrasing
4:07 – resequencing
4:33 – details in prompts
5:21 – perplexity and bursting us
7:46 – what you should really be doing

................................................

▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES

AI TOOLS

▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED YOUTUBE TOOLS AND SERVICES

▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels

[DrAndyStapleton]

For those wondering about a text that was written manually. I put my PhD thesis literature review into originality and got a 1% AI score. Make of that what you will!

[jamesbundi]

If paraphrased work is being detected as Ai then it means that AI detection tools are way too harsh now and they are punishing slightly original content as well

[_boracic_atreus_]

I would absolutely challenge any AI detection to my work. If detection tools are giving out "97% AI" for paraphrased work, then they're clearly not fit-for-purpose. I dont think any student or academic will be failed or rejected on the strength of AI detection tools alone. Plagiarism can be proved without any shadow of a doubt. It is easy to build a really strong, irrefutable case for plagiarism...the same cannot be said for AI generated content. There will always be room for doubt. Someone may just have a writing style that is very similar to a generative AI tool. There is no way to definitely prove that a piece of content has been generated by AI. Institutions would end up being sued if they start heavily penalizing people on the strength of detection tools.

[joshuafoley]

So...2 things: 1) The percentage shows how confident the software is that the tested text was generated by AI; NOT the percentage of text that was generated by Ai.
2) I just ran a paragraph of my PhD thesis through it. I 100% made those lines of text because it is (literally) my original contribution to the field of IR. The results came back 50/50...First impression: This is a dangerous tool if professors think it is the end-all be all to detecting Ai...a lot of students might lose that battle just because the professor can't see my first point and into my case study (which proved to be very not accurate)

[terrynarvaiz]

I actually tested papers from 2015 in several AI detection bots and they were flagged as AI... I am in college so this has become very stressful for me to have my essays flagged when I know I wrote them without the help of AI.

[Steve-broc]

Going to start my own ai detector that just flags everything as 100% ai.

[michaelroussi]

I use AI for framework and direction/guidance in bullet points and then research each bullet point to write in my own language. This works. AI is your assistant to write not write on your behalf.

[cryptolew]

Thank you for this. Excellent demonstration and guidance, especially for students. It's the lower end AI scores that at least alert me as an educator to check carefully for AI/plagiarism. Upon further investigation--typically I find more, and it is provable as plagiarism without a detection tool. I'm finding that some detectors are clearly better than others.

[cashbuyer]

Chatgpt doesn’t write well enough for academic papers anyway. It’s great for providing a general structure that can be heavily edited and elaborated or for getting started just to build momentum.

[StatisticsSupreme]

Pls follow up this video with a broad range of original texts and original-AI-mixed texts and how those checkers perform there. Thx. Great work you are doing.

[andreinikiforov]

The Originality AI seems overly sensitive, skewing towards false positives. I tested one of my original articles from the early 2000s, and it labeled it as 79% AI-generated. It appears to default to marking everything as AI-produced unless proven otherwise. It's a case of 'guilty until proven innocent'

[_salvax_]

Andy, great video, as usual ! Many thanks.
Please, note however, that most of these tools are not able to make a difference between text created by AI and text corrected by AI, and will give all of them a low human score. This particularly impacts non English native people that tend to use AI tools to correct their texts. (I know it by... personal experience !)
Based on my own experience, UniCheck gives a very different score to text generated by AI and text corrected by AI, which could be because it is capable of making that difference.

[NiniDeserve]

This is not true AT ALL. I put in my papers from my undergrad from 2014 in this Undetectable Ai and it told me that it was written by Ai 99% which is just rubbish since Ai was not around at that time.

[JohnDlugosz]

This reminds me of the case where the professor flunked the entire class for using ChatGPT to write the essays, even though they did not. Seems his tool was flagging everything as "AI detected" regardless of whether or not it actually was written by AI. 100% false positive!
How do we know that's not what's happening to you? Perhaps any well-organized grammatically correct text is flagged as AI.

[emmanuelannan]

I typed in "how are you" into an AI detector and it says 100% AI. Right there I knew these detectors were actually fucked up. Their outcomes are based on how they feel about a particular sentence or phrase. 😅

[bsdxwge]

I condense about half of the content in my own words, which often leads to favorable grading from my professor. This approach saves time on reading and researching. While I recognize that it's primarily the professor's responsibility, the industry heavily relies on AI for various tasks such as policy writing, coding, and drafting letters. Those who fail to adapt risk falling behind. As a side note, this message has been enhanced with AI.

[TQuantP]

I think it's actually fine to use AI to produce academic work. AI doesn't generate original ideas, it just implements them. Think of chat-GPT as a lab assistant or something.

I have used it to generate the code needed to run my regressions nevertheless. Since I don't really like the way AI writes academic work I don't use it that much in the paper, but since in my field all experiments are statistical I use it heavily as an intern 😂

[tamtam]

The research was interesting and torough. I’m definitely subscribing.

[rubyg]

Thanks so much! I used your affiliate link. So pleased with their service.

[donglasgow]

It appears from what is written here that, using Grammarly to correct errors in my writing, have turned it into potentially AI written. So, still going to use Grammarly just only for spelling and typos, and not their sentence suggestions.