Bergson's Holographic Theory - 45b - QM Crisis - Bell, Bohm and the ether

Part 45b A Quantum of Crisis - Bell/Bohm

*- Bell and Hidden Variables
*- Bohm's Pilot Wave
*- Relativistic Locality must go
*- Back to the ether
*- Back to Realism, NOT the Quantum Woo

Links

Is this what QM looks like? 7 min.

A remarkable, concrete demo of the nature of the pilot wave.

The channel guy says, “Is this PROOF of how QM is? No.” He should have said, “No, but it shows we should ditch Copenhagen and start focusing on proof of (and deeper understanding of) Bohm.”

Sabine Hossenfelder
The Trouble with Many Worlds

[rich]

One other point which I forgot to mention in my previous comment: DeBroglie wrote in one of his essays that he considered the "particle" as simply a wave perturbation, this removing that duality from nature and making all of nature a manifestation of waves.

[faqtum]

I am here. following th whole series for the consciousness part of Bergson thinking.
Laughing at the apparent coincidence of a Crow making notices simultaneously with your funny last comments!
Thank you Steve. Amazing work. With many new things for me.

[vittorio]

The problem, I think, is that the relativity theory is not so relative. One reference frame affects others frames, and this in space and in time.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

Have you read Jean Bricmont yet? He's the expert on the misunderstanding of John Bell and he promotes the Broglie-Bohm model

[rich]

Really enjoyed your presentation and I ordered the Norsen book since, after reviewing some illustrative pages, send quite worthwhile. I would like to add to your presentation with this quote from Bohm's book, Science, Order and Creativity (sounds like Bergson 😃), p.88:

The Causal Interpretation:
"Although the interpretation is termed causal, this should not be taken as implying a form of complete determinism. Indeed, it will be shown that this interpretation opens the door for the creative operation of underlying, and yet subtler, levels of reality."

Note, in my comment in your previous excellent video, Part A, I provided a quote by Max Planck, reaffirming that Nature is Mind. Both Bohm and Planck, in their own manner philosophical agreed with Bergson, that we are Creative Mind.

Thanks again!

[andrzejmalachowicz]

Somehow, this one feels like your best one. In my own reference frame ;)