filmov
tv
Open access publishing under COVID-19: EASL Viewpoint with Prof. Zucman-Rossi
Показать описание
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a flood of calls for articles, joint registries, for sharing data and evidence. What does this unique time mean for open access science publishing?
Prof. Jessica Zucman-Rossi, Editor-in-Chief of EASL’s open access journal, JHEP Reports, and Director of the Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, talks about how the current rush for publishing on COVID-19 may affect the quality of science publishing.
She describes the publishing options typically available to researchers, and their inherent risks and opportunities. As a scientist and journal editor, Prof. Zucman-Rossi emphasises the non-negotiables of research, qualities that must prevail no matter the urgency of the pandemic. She warns against publishing too much, too fast, without following the correct processes and reminds scientists of their accountability to the wider public.
Questions discussed:
00:07 What are the pros and cons of open access publishing?
01:58 What kind of journal publishing do you wish to see in the future?
03:04 How might this pandemic affect science publishing?
08:15 Do you have a message for your fellow scientists?
---------------------------------
Disclaimer: As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, treatment strategies are being developed and adjusted accordingly. EASL Viewpoints serve as snapshot interviews from the frontline and are intended to reflect the experiences at the time of the interview only.
Key resources
---------------------------------
#openaccess #coronavirus #publishing
Prof. Jessica Zucman-Rossi, Editor-in-Chief of EASL’s open access journal, JHEP Reports, and Director of the Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, talks about how the current rush for publishing on COVID-19 may affect the quality of science publishing.
She describes the publishing options typically available to researchers, and their inherent risks and opportunities. As a scientist and journal editor, Prof. Zucman-Rossi emphasises the non-negotiables of research, qualities that must prevail no matter the urgency of the pandemic. She warns against publishing too much, too fast, without following the correct processes and reminds scientists of their accountability to the wider public.
Questions discussed:
00:07 What are the pros and cons of open access publishing?
01:58 What kind of journal publishing do you wish to see in the future?
03:04 How might this pandemic affect science publishing?
08:15 Do you have a message for your fellow scientists?
---------------------------------
Disclaimer: As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, treatment strategies are being developed and adjusted accordingly. EASL Viewpoints serve as snapshot interviews from the frontline and are intended to reflect the experiences at the time of the interview only.
Key resources
---------------------------------
#openaccess #coronavirus #publishing
0:10:22
0:59:20
1:01:08
0:02:02
0:02:07
0:03:14
0:58:06
0:06:48
0:06:23
0:27:30
0:05:56
0:23:51
0:45:42
1:46:14
0:06:17
1:05:49
0:50:30
1:05:00
0:58:16
0:07:05
0:57:15
3:24:31
1:00:00
0:01:51