Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies 3D force Systems | Mechanics Statics | (solved examples)

preview_player
Показать описание
Let's go through how to solve 3D equilibrium problems with 3 force reactions and 3 moment reactions. We go through multiple examples step by step and find reactions for different supports like journal bearings, fixed supports, and ball and socket joints.

If you found these videos helpful and you really want to give something, it's very much appreciated.
Donate:

Intro (00:00)
The sign has a mass of 100 kg with center of mass at G. (01:18)
Determine the components of reaction at the fixed support A. (04:41)
The shaft is supported by three smooth journal bearings at A, B, and C. (06:46)

Book used: R. C. Hibbeler and K. B. Yap, Engineering Mechanics Statics.
Hoboken: Pearson, 2017.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i have been struggling lately in mechanics rigid body statics ... however life has been a little bit easier lately since after finishing my learning module, i go straight to this channel and watch the corresponding lessons ... this channel is very helpful keep it up bro Godbless you

wanpanman
Автор

Damn!!! There is not a single channel which teaches mechanics better than you, your animations are like every concept is getting arranged in my mind and it become impossible to forget the concepts!!

vineetkarmakar
Автор

OH YOU BEAUTIFUL MAN THANK YOU THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I NEEDED TO KNOW

ponyqi
Автор

Thanks please keep it up you are a hero to a victim of the worst education system ever.

brokenEngineerMathAndPhysics
Автор

I've been searching for videos that explain this well for days. Your last example finally conveyed the idea in a way I could understand. Really appreciate your work.

vynmsmc
Автор

wow!! I was struggling with this topic in my mechanics class but you cleared up all the issues i had! Thank u:)

JesusMartinez-zuxl
Автор

I came across your channel by chance while studying for exam and wow!! Such a simple and clear explanation. Thank you so much!! I wish I could've seen this earlier. But I'm even more amazed on how you really look into and reply to each question on the comments. You deserve more recognition. Thank you thank you 🙌

camillepajarillaga
Автор

Yeahh, I'm with my saviour again. God bless you!

emirkucuk
Автор

Incredible work, thank you so much! These videos are more helpful than all my course notes put together.

MadeGains
Автор

awesome video especially with the 3 different sockets mentioned

thomasdesmet
Автор

Sir I'm giving u a cup when it comes to rigid bodies in 3d 💪🤘🔌. You are the best one

cappmasters
Автор

thank you for this video, i’m studying for my statics midterm tomorrow and this helped me so much!!

kbtbxer
Автор

I just discovered this channel I wish I found it before my midterm...

eliko
Автор

As Salamualaikum 🤗
Thank you so much for your videos, they have been really helping me in my studies!!!
I just wanted to ask in the last question at 9:33
Why in the sum of moments in z axis we multiply 250 by 2.7☺️?
Why not 1.8?
Why would we multiply 900 by 2.7?
Would you please answer me if you could as I am really confused 💔💔💔
Thanks in Advance 💖

amrhelmy
Автор

Hi
I love your videos which is very helpful for me thank you very much. I look forward to watch new videos, such as Strength of meterials, Differantial Equation etc . :)


suleymankaya
Автор

Great Video! I still do not understand why the reactionary support moments were removed from the equation.

brando
Автор

at 9:35 why is the 450n force considered? And why is its perpendicular distance 0.6m?

fuakaitako
Автор

quick urgent question, is this Chapter 5 EQUILIBRIUM OF A RIGID BODY
& FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS?? and do you explain in any of your videos LECTURE 15 - EQUATIONS OF EQUILIBRIUM & TWO- AND THREE-FORCE MEMEBERS?? and THAANK YOU FOR THIS AMAZING VIDEOOO😍

uivzzvr
Автор

In the 2nd question, for calculating moments, you can also use the formula M = Fd, right, instead of doing the cross product?

Hussain-qtti
Автор

I never realized that when it comes to momentum sum, we can use the sum for each axis instead than on a point. I guess it's working the same in 2d ? Because all my professors did the sum in one particular point..

The.Wonderful.Inspiration.Of.