“Institutional COVER-UP Of Cost Of Immigration” | Robert Jenrick SLAMS Large-Scale Migration

preview_player
Показать описание
Robert Jenrick has criticised ministers for allegedly hiding the true costs of large-scale migration, calling it an “institutional cover-up.” Running for Conservative Party leader, he claimed the public is “tired of being misled” about the economic and social impacts of net migration, which reached 685,000 last year.

Jenrick accused the government of not publishing data on crimes committed by foreign nationals due to concerns over “social cohesion.” He added that migration policy is “shrouded in secrecy,” with officials claiming migration is economically beneficial, despite a recent report from the Office for Budget Responsibility indicating low-skilled migrants cost more in welfare, healthcare, and pensions than they contribute in taxes.

Peter Cardwell speaks with Director at the Centre for Migration and Economic Prosperity, Steven Woolfe and Senior Fellow from the New Culture Forum, Philip Kiszely.

#news #politics #crime #immigration #uk #talk #talkradio
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

We have every right to know the cost, its us the tax payers that pay for it.

stevedickson
Автор

A million eu migrants are in social housing also. This needs to be given back to the English, Scottish and Welsh.

sh.
Автор

Reform is the only way forward for GB. Conservative and Labour have sold us out.

jenniferbarry
Автор

problem is whatever Jenrick says or promises he makes the rest of the party dont hold the same views and will not back him - Reform is the only option out of this mess

goonmerchant
Автор

All going according to Starmer's plan.

FredScuttle
Автор

Wow…. We must stand up to this we must

chriswhite-io
Автор

Migrants should be made to pay back all the money spent on them, just like our university students. Why should there be one rule for one group and a different rule for the other?

real_philosophy_audiobooks
Автор

Albanians arent a race thryre a nationality so cant be racist against them

douglastaggart
Автор

What business doesnt keep a tally of its costs? the excuse that it would cost too much doesnt wash! as if they didn't know, how could they afford to provision it?? does that mean its a black hole where people in the department can syphon of huge sums of money without getting caught?

DevilbyMoonlight
Автор

Another option would be for the government stop giving them the richest social service package in all of Europe.
That would be a lot cheaper!

wickertwm
Автор

This coming from the man who was immigration minister when they was in power, Talk about irony

peterosullivan-ob
Автор

I am still waiting to hear from the Labour Cabinet on what the definition of Islamophobia, a woman, far right and working class are. They are clear that 'illegal' means irregular and should have a bipartisan vote on all definitions then see what the electorate of the UK have to say?

kennethrichardson
Автор

Until the sheeple vote properly the country will only get worse

lesmccomb
Автор

GDP per Capita vs USA has been falling behind at a rate of 3% per year since 2007. In 2007, the UK was ahead, now the US is 50% ahead of the UK. China, another story again, they have grown their economy by an average of 10% per year over the last 40 years, 1000% in that time. The UK, and the EU, total disaster, authoritarian rule has stifled innovation and growth. The UK has actually managed to go nowhere at all since 2007. The Tories did nothing. Labour are going precisely the wrong way, massive immigration and punishing anyone who either works hard or has aspiration, the polar opposite of how you create wealth, the very thing that pays for the NHS, for education, for our transport system, for our wellbeing, and all of that is going take another hit as Labour apply their tax hikes and spending hikes. Whoever voted for this might want to never vote like this again.

CliveSimmons-bb
Автор

What did Jenerick actually do when he was Immugration Minister ?

timg
Автор

Our Canadian Government brought in about 4 times the number of immigrants last year than UK (number based on population). The Liberal Trudeau Government allowed of 1.2 million migrants (mostly from India) into the country, and it was not until they realized that there was not the infrastructure (housing, medical, social services, etc...) to support this number of migrants so quickly and as well as the massive push back by the voters.
Due to their abysmal polling, the PM has decided to reduce the number of immigrants in 2025 by 20%. This may be in order to increase his polling numbers, but anyway you look at it the Liberal party will be thrown from office in the next general election, and the Conservative government will win a majority.
Just like in the UK people are fed up with a government that does not work for the people.
Immigration is a make or break policy for any government.

wickertwm
Автор

How can we possibly subsidise all of this incredible illegal migrant expenditure and at the same time swallow eye watering tax rises and cuts to winter fuel payments for our most vulnerable?
This country is on its knees and yet we continue on paying out for this folly.
Just begs the question… Why???
Why are we just rolling over and letting this madness go on?

bronson
Автор

When Trump gets in office.. wait for conversation with 2TK.. your done mate.. DONE.

kermit
Автор

Our local authority as just housed a family from Argentina? X5

carolokbrblol
Автор

Just please I hope trump can get rid off this government, don't cross a man like that, go trump.

ort