The Elder Scrolls 6 Is In A 'Playable State' - Luke Reacts

preview_player
Показать описание
--

--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#gaming #LukeStephens #ps5 #xbox
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

4 times the loading screens, 16 times the recycled assets, all of this just works.

andresbogado
Автор

By Bethesda standards, this seems like horrible news.

FRDSoldier
Автор

My expectations are extremely low. They haven't made a good game since Skyrim and all their games since have seemed like a Disney version of Bethesda instead of the dark games in messed up worlds they made in the past.

Wibtlol
Автор

Remember, “playable” to Todd Howard is 10-15 fps on low settings.

danielsan
Автор

Guess that Starfield roadmap went straight to the trash LOL

ito
Автор

Them saying they have a playable build sounds like they are using the same game engine.

chrisleb
Автор

The fact that Todd Howard said Starfield was his pet dream project he’s always wanted to do.. speaks volumes! I’m terrified for elder scrolls 6.

trevylangton
Автор

Lmao technically Starfield is playable. The question is...do you really want to?

richarddeaton
Автор

Tbh I have zero faith in it being a good game. I wish this wasn't the case.

PeaceLove
Автор

The announcement sounds like a “Hey! Don’t forget us please! Over here!👋 “

keysncoffee
Автор

"It's in a playable state" = "Please investors, don't sell your stocks yet!"

dudebruh
Автор

I don't know. Todd Howard's interviews in lead up to Starfield were weird. He seems like a nice guy but he just seemed off... either he's delusional or he knew Starfield sucked and was trying to put on a brave face. The institutional arrogance of expecting (unpaid) modders to fix your game and make it fun is outrageous.

Arizona-exyt
Автор

After Starflop you know they are fast tracking ES6.

tyisamess
Автор

Their definition of playable may not be the same as ours

kylewhitmore
Автор

You know 3-4 years ago I would've been unbelievably excited for Elder Scrolls 6. But with the trajectory Bethesda seems to be taking, I have a hard time believing they are going to deliver. I hope I'm wrong. I really do, but my expectations are extremely low. Maybe that will end up being a good thing.

emilioedj
Автор

Im a 3D artist, iv worked in Unreal, Unity, CryEngine, and spent countless hours in the Creation engine. I am NOT claiming to know everything about game development! I constantly see people blaming the creation engine for the short comings of BGS and it simply isn't the case. Outside of a few engine level bugs that they could fix if they bothered, its fine, in fact its tailored to the type of games they make save for Starfield, they just shouldn't have tried to make a space game with it. CDPR went to Unreal because the red engine is hard to work with and not because it lacks power or ability conversely the Creation engine is probably the easiest engine iv ever worked with. Game engines are not made of steel, they can be changed/updated, if BGS was to go to Unreal Id expect their game would look ~20% better, perform about the same or worse, have the same amount of bugs and we almost certainly wouldn't get a level editor for modding.

jundersplunkett
Автор

Games are in a 'Playable State' like a month or two into development.

kambyyy
Автор

Starfield's in a playable state too. It's nothing to get excited about.

stuartrumbel
Автор

I have such low expectations, but at the same time, if they don't blow me away, im not wasting my time on it.

You hear me Bethesda "take your best shot." im rooting for you.

cordingdesert
Автор

They have bad writers. They clearly haven’t had a heartfelt moment where they’ve decided to change direction. I expect more slop/laziness.

I just hope the mages guild quest line isn’t as bad as the college of winterhold.

davidfl