Aryan invasion, migration theory (Truth or fiction) India documentary

Aryan invasion, migration theory (Truth or fiction) India documentary

Epimetheus on Patreon

David Frawley Aryan invasion videos

Tags:
Aryan invasion india, india history, indian history, documentary, history of india, india,history, india documentary, hindi, 2018, ancient india, indus valley civilization, 5,000 Years History of India documentary, Aryan migration theory, Aryan invasion theory, indo-aryan, indo Aryan migration

[rightlibertarian]

So nostalgic.
Only 1500 BC kids will remember.

[herearewe]

For people who don't understand this controversy, it is more political than scientific. There is scientific evidence for genetic and cultural amalgamation into India from the North Western borders. The denial of the same is the political controversy.

[indraindian]

The narrator is very careful with Indian audience. he is diplomatic Indeed 😂

[silentone]

When politics and feelings get in the way of history.

[HassanRadwan]

I have no horse in this race re: Aryan migration/Non-Migration - so I'm not interested in trying to prove it one way or another. What I would say is I find it very hard to believe any race or people have remained uninfluenced culturally, politically, religiously etc... by neighbouring races & peoples. History shows us a constant exchange of ideas & ebb and flow of peoples, some looking for better resources, others seeking to conquer and so on. Unless one lives in some incredibly remote, unreachable & isolated spot - it seems absurd to claim some sort of purity of race or beliefs. What concerns me more are those whose interest in history is motivated by a desire to confirm or support a preconceived notion. Real scholarship should be driven by the evidence no matter where it leads to - not so that one can justify personal beliefs or preconceptions.

[dominiqueblagojevic]

India is definitely ethnically diverse. There are so many different languages in one country. Plus they vary in degree of brown skin and facial features

[mamtayadav]

Politics Will Never Let This Question Settle.

[h_]

2021: Saraswati river actually existed. proved.

[marcelcostache]

Sanskrit to polish

ParaVidya; in polish PraVda,

SamaVeda; in polish SamoVedza

TheraWada is polish StheraVedza

Till this day ceremonial Pali language used in Sri Lanka is more similar to slovenian than slovenian to german.

Most striking example for me is

Hima(sanskrit) - Zima(polish) -Winter

Himo(sanskrit) - Zimno(polish) - cold

lyate(sanskrit) - ležat(polish) - lie (down)

so

Himalaya(hindu) - means Zimalež -(we use name Himalaje) -Himalayas

Himalaya in polish means Hima=Zima Laya(cut down lyate)= ležat, place were winter lies all the time.




Romanian to sanskrit


Romanian

numerals : unu, doi, trei, patru, cinci, sase, sapte...100=suta

Sanskrit

numerals: unu, dvi, tri, ciatru, penci, sas, saptan...100 = satan

then Romanian Sanskrit

acasa acasha (at home)

acu acu (now)

lup lup ( wolf)

a iubi (considered slave) iub (love)

frate vrate (brother)

camera camera (room)

limba lamba (tongue)

nepot napat (neffew)

mandru mandra (proud)

lupta lupta (fight)

pandur pandur (infanterist)

nevasta navasti (wife)

prieten prietema (friend)

pranz prans (lunch time)

Ruman Ramana (Romanian)

saptamana saptnahan (week)

struguri strughuri (grapes)

vale vale (valley)

vadana vadana (widow)

a zambi dzambaiami (to smile)

umbra dumbra (shadow)

om om (man-kind)

dusman dusman (enemy)

a invata invati (to study)

a crapa crapaiami (to break something)

naiba naiba (evil)

apa apa (water) and not AQUA like in Latin. It looks like aqua came from apa and not the other way around...





The similarities between the languages had already been noted in 1768 by Gaston Cœurdoux, who informed the French Academy. The evidence for this came from (1) the structure of the languages -- Sanskrit grammar has detailed similarities to Greek (and, as would later be seen, Avestan), many similarities to Latin, and none to the Middle Eastern languages, like Hebrew, Arabic, or Turkish, interposed between Europe and India [note] -- and (2) the vocabulary of the languages.

Thus, "father" in English compares to Vater in German, pater in Latin, , patêr in Greek, , pitr. in Sanskrit, , pedar in Persian, etc. On the other hand, "father" in Hebrew is, âbh, and in Arabic is, ab, which hardly seem like any of the others -- they are Semitic languages. Similarly, "daughter" in English (with its mysterious "gh") compares to Tochter in German, , thugátêr in Greek, and, dokhtar in Persian. Latin uses a different root. Meanwhile, "daughter" in Arabic is, bint, which is also clearly a different root. As it happens, the "gh" in English, now silent, was once pronounced like the ch in German. Persian and German "daughter" differ only in accent, the voicing of the initial consonsant, and some vowel quality.

[JohnSmith-hzpo]

What about genetic DNA it shows that there are 2 clusters of R1a1 gene, north India and Persia and Russia, Poland and Belarus. The theory is that Aryans split into 2 groups with one ending up in India the other is central Europe

[matheuroux]

How can saying that Sanskrit is a Indo-European language be racist?

[PasenadiReal]

Funny thing is that, The major commentor against Aryan Invasion theory are Aryan Brahmins. lol

[powerist]

4:39- I remember Tolkien's criticism of that notion along with them ruining German mythos that he studied. He explained how Nazi persecuted Gypsies, who are more related to the real Aryan than the Germans.

[phanikarthikcs]

Update: Chariots have been found in Sanauli predating "Aryan-migration" (1500BC).

[charliejdk]

Modern politics often goes to war against the past to use it for current campaigns. Your video is measured, transparent, & respectful. Good work.

[naveenchowdary]

Latest update: Yajnadevam has deciphered the Indus script by treating it as a cryptogram, and has made some recent discoveries about the script, including:
1.The Indus script is proto-abugida segmental, with signs for consonants and vowels.
2.Indus inscriptions are in grammatically correct post-Vedic Sanskrit.
3.Brahmi glyphs are standardized Indus signs.
4.Indus linguistic features and cultural elements continued significantly in post-bronze age India.

[aniruddhbhatkal]

Hmmm just a caveat.
I belong to one of several communities who call ourselves "Sarasvats". Or "Children of Sarasvati". Our traditions tell us that we are descended from the people who once lived by the aforementioned Saraswati river, and moved south when it dried.
So descendants of those people still live, POSSIBLY. I don't know anything about the truth of that.

[__spacejunk__]

Beware ! comments section is disasterous

[tranchedecake]

For a while I thought that the Hungarian vs Romanian debate of who was in Transylvania first was one of the toxic most ones.
And then I saw this :/

[PhiloLogos]

Of course there was an Aryan migration. It’s an irrefutable fact that northern Indian languages are related to Iranian (Aryan=Iranian) languages of Western and Central Asia and European languages. Hence the existence of the INDO-EUROPEAN language family. These languages are completely genetically unrelated to the native Dravidian languages that dominate Southern India. Considering how populous the Indian subcontinent is, in order for these languages to have so thoroughly supplanted the preexisting Dravidian languages, there must have been a considerable influx of new people into the region in order to have effected such a dramatic change in language, if even for allowing for small scale “elite dominance” models of language transfer. Moreover, the Hindu caste system is fundamentally tied to race and associated with skin color, with the highest ranking castes also being associated with the lightest skin tones of peoples in those caste. To pretend this didn’t happen for the sake of political correctness is absurd. We’re talking about 4, 000 year old migrations. Name me one people in history who haven’t been the subject of conquest by an outside power at some point!? So who cares? Why is that a slight on the people of India anymore than the Roman conquest of Gaul (France), the Spanish conquest of Mexico or the Anglo-Saxon conquest of Celtic speaking Britain? People move around like they always have and we’re all descendants of the mixing of people groups no matter who we are and there’s no shame in that.