Simplifying Async/Await Error Handling with Tuple Responses

---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Async/Await nested try/catch

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Simplifying Async/Await Error Handling with Tuple Responses

The Problem: Nested Try/Catch Blocks

Let’s say you have two asynchronous functions, foo and bar, which are designed to make separate API requests. Each function has its own try/catch block for managing errors. You find yourself needing to call foo first, and if it fails, catch that error and subsequently call bar. Should bar also throw an error, you’ll want to handle that too. The initial approach may look something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Then you’ll call these functions with nested try/catch:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This can quickly become messy and hard to maintain. So, how can we avoid this nesting while ensuring effective error handling?

The Solution: Returning Tuples of [result, error]

The Tuple Approach

Instead of wrapping each request in a try/catch block, we can return a tuple that includes both the result of the request and any potential error. This method drastically reduces the need for nested try/catch around your function calls, making your code cleaner and much easier to follow.

Here’s how you can refactor foo and bar to implement tuple responses:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Handling Errors Without Nesting

By using tuples, the error handling becomes much cleaner. Here’s how you can call these functions:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this approach:

The first element of each tuple represents the successful result of the asynchronous operation.

The second element of each tuple is reserved for errors, allowing for straightforward error checking without nesting.

Benefits of this Approach

Readability: It becomes easier to see the flow of your logic without deeply nested structures.

Maintainability: Future changes to your error handling logic are simpler, as you only need to edit checks at specific points instead of digging through levels of nested code.

Flexibility: You can use similar tuple patterns in various other areas of your code for consistent error handling.

Conclusion

Feel free to adjust this technique based on your specific needs and experience. Happy coding!