Biden's Final Act Allowed Ukraine To OBLITERATE Russia

preview_player
Показать описание
President Joe Biden has made a groundbreaking decision in the Ukraine war, granting permission for Ukraine to use U.S.-made ATACMS missiles against Russian territory. This historic move comes after years of deliberation and marks a major turning point in the conflict. With the power to strike deep into Russia, Ukraine gains the upper hand, targeting strategic assets like airfields and supply lines. Join us as we explore Biden’s decision, its impact on the war, and what’s next for Ukraine and Russia.

#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Stop calling them long range, they are mid range but super effective.

MrAllan
Автор

You can also stop using the term "obliterate", totally ridiculous.

Cervin_Suisse
Автор

So France can't send troops to Ukraine but Russia can use North Korean troops? Got it😂
Edit: OMG I'VE NEVER BEEN THIS FAMOUS BEFORE :O

WopJe
Автор

"obliterate the Russian Federation"
What a load of rubbish.
The approval is significant as it allows them to target sites more than 200 km inside Russia, but to suggest they will "obliterate" Russia is the height of propagadistic hyperbole.

barneyhall
Автор

Wait.. so youre saying the rules are... Russia can start the war and attack on Ukraine soil.. but Ukraine is not allowed to strike inside Russia??!? Got

seandengler
Автор

If the interception rate is really what Russia claims I don’t know why they’re so upset…..

sixxdim
Автор

Biden just lobbed a live hand grenade to Trump and wished him good luck...

freddiebox
Автор

Basically, the Russian position boils down to, "It's OK if we strike Ukraine with long and medium-range missiles, but don't you dare give the Ukrainians similar non-nuclear missiles so they can defend themselves, or give them permission to use them against us, or we will use nuclear missiles in return." Neither the ATACMS nor Storm Shadow missiles present a legitimate existential threat to Russia, as they are tactical-level weapons that are non-nuclear.

The only reason whay NATO forces are positioned as close to the Russian border as they are is to keep Putin honest and dissuade him from invading any part of Europe and seizing territory that doesn't belong to him. NATO has no desire to invade Russia.

The hypocrisy coming from Russia is rank.

stevestruthers
Автор

I love how the Russians want everything their way in this war. They have their friends, N Korea, helping them, Ukraine can have their friends help them.

andrewgaffney
Автор

Both US and UK signed, with Russia, to defend the sovereignty of Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum so why do people argue against supporting them. As the offender Russia should not be surprised that they are facing such a response which should in fact be much stronger. Hope Trump does not allow Putin to get away with this and continues to support Ukraine.

tedtratt
Автор

It was a limited green light with limited effect. Also pretty late.
Also Crimea is part of Ukraine to most countries in the world including the US. They consider the annexation illegal and invalid.

ZoltanBojas-ugnf
Автор

Long range missiles? Icbms are long range missiles, these are midrange missiles. Big difference.

elixier
Автор

The West and the USA should help Ukraine for one simple reason. Because we said we would... if we give up on Ukraine, then we have lost all integrity.

They gave up their nuclear weapons on the word that America, and by extension Nato gave many years ago.

Lets not leave them in their time of need.

tracksremastered
Автор

Biden should've given this permission months ago. Also, permission to use the anti-personnel mines. Everything has been done late and to cause the least effect. It's not a good way to win or get the upper hand.

ugaugauga
Автор

Arming, Ukraine is in fact defending the U.S. Russia has wasted half of its manpower and half, at least, of its armaments, fighting a country 1/4 its size. Its economy is ruined. And it doesn't have the money to rebuild the lost military resources. Russia's ability to sell its military goods to the rest of the world has been greatly diminished due to the failure of its weapons against the weapons the West has provided.

arthurhill
Автор

Fun fact: Taiwan has just received the first of 64 ATACMS systems. The launch points for any Chinese invasion of Taiwan are in easy range of ATACMS.

pahtar
Автор

People thousand for miles away from the war making bad decisions in the war have always been the American down fall.

bulletproofpepper
Автор

Why is the Kerch Bridge still standing?

tommiller
Автор

The S400 can't shoot down ducks, let alone a missile travelling as fast as the atacm. If you doubt that, then ask Iran how good and useful the S400 is

AdamCook-qr
Автор

Mr. Scholz, FREE TAURUS NOW 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

holgermuller