David Gross - A Century of Quantum Mechanics

On Wednesday 2 October 2013 at 15.00 The 2004 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Professor David Gross gives the lecture:

"A Century of Quantum Mechanics"

Quantum Mechanics is approximately one hundred years old and has proven to be the most successful theoretical framework in the history of physics. In this talk I review the present status of quantum mechanics and the remarkable success of quantum field theory, as demonstrated by the standard model of particle physics. Finally I discuss the challenges that we face in realizing the goal of unifying all the forces of nature including gravity.

[VeilerDark]

55:02 the Earth has a big probabilistic range of possible partial entanglement linkages,
so not the whole Earth pulls an object, it simply allows probabilistically more partially enangled linkages to occur
than if the Earth was smaller - also the gravitational pull is reciprocal - The Earth-apple systems offers more probable linkages than an apple-apple gravitational system. But we have the same force at both objects, because the gravitational
probabilistic linkage is always reciprocal.

[okoiful]

could u not leave the camera still? its dizzy!

[tarekazzam]

Current Algebra, Asymptotic Freedom, Quantum Field Theory, String Theory: Topics with which Nobel Laureate David Gross [Undergraduate Studies of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem] has dealt and not as erroneously claimed at the Tamil University of Jerusalem". Nor at the "Swahili University of Jerusalem".

[VeilerDark]

55:02 he claimed every atom of the Earth attracts his pointer while we already know
that the Earth is huge, and statistically some of Earth's particles are by chance entangled
or partialy entangled with his pointer, but this is not an overall entanglement of his pointer,
there are many trillions of micro-entangled groups, also that partialy entangled groups
do go out of spin phase when a single particle's angular momentum because of various visceral time-flows
breaks that partial entanglement. A 100% binary total entanglement requires the same visceral time-flow
among the entangled particles. In partial entanglement not all visceral time-flow perceptions of grouped particles are the same. That disharmonic pressure causes that group of partial entanglements to degrade to
the closest posible new set of partial entanglements, and that happens to be closer to the center of the overall mass.

Gravity is a probabilistic phenomenon of degrading partially entangled group sets.
We do not have an overall entanglement, but tiny groups inside objects, and the partially entangled
particles don't have to be close but simply to be part of an entanglemental group.

Neutron stars are very close to have all of their particles almost perfectly entangled,
but this never can occur for more than two particles. Maximum degenerate pressure,
creates a black hole particle. Yes, a black hole is a particle. Inside a black hole there are only chromodynamic oscillations, therefore none can travel inside a black hole, except if you believe that a chromodynamically smashed
human would be still able to smile. You can "play" with the black hole surface.
Nothing can enter inside a black hole, no matter how low your iq is and in spite your need to die.

[tarekazzam]

Good Idea, David. I mean the invention of spacetime with brain Evolution at Infancy.

[tarekazzam]

لا تقل "ءابحث مع الشرطة" و ءانما قل "ءابحث مع الحق و مع الصفوة".

[sekoivu]

I like David Gross. He's proud reductionist, and surely knows his task.

[jacobvandijk]

To go short, Physics at the extremes (very small and very large) is and will be very speculative. But still we call it science!?!? I call it Dark Physics.

[pacajalbert]

kto neverí nemôže sa to stať musí to mat v sebe

[schmetterling]

An old, confused man who doesn't understand quantum mechanics speaks about quantum mechanics. Boomer time! ;-)

[VeilerDark]

the Schrödinger's cats experiment is not true, because even tough a cat is consisted by particles,

as a whole she does not have all atoms aligned in harmonic groups that have aligned spins and rotational loops.

we have build even big aluminium plates that behave quatumechanically

if most atoms are looping all their information in order, and if few do not at the next loop they reallign themselves to the

mean looping pattern.


many low iq PhDs do not understand quantum mechanics and claim with no real data

that we do not need loops, simply because we are not clever enough to study what loops of data are,