MH-CET Law 2023 Legal Reasoning | Most Expected Questions | Part 3 | MH-CET Law Exam Revision

Most Expected Questions of Legal Reasoning & Legal Aptitude for MH-CET Law 2023: What are the most important questions of the Legal Reasoning & Legal Aptitude section for MH-CET Law 2023? What type of questions can be asked in MH-CET Law 2023? BYJU’S Exam Prep Expert- Surajit Bhaduri will discuss 20+ most expected legal reasoning questions for MH-CET Law 2023. This session is a very important session for MH-CET Law 2023.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
👩‍💻 Smart Playlist to Watch our Most Popular CLAT & OLETs Free Video Lectures:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top Playlist for CLAT & OLET Aspirants:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
📚🎡Important PLAYLISTS📚🎡
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#mhcetlaw2023 #legal_reasoning #legal_aptitude_questions #mhcetlaw2023_Legal_Reasoning_Preparation #byjusexamprep

[mandabedarkar]

Sir plz giv imp prep for llb entrance exams 2024 plz plz

[UshaSingh-uede]

Hlo sir, are u gonna give us legal gk also?

[mandabedarkar]

Sir plz for llb entrance 3yrs 2024 coding decoding syollism directions I find it difficult can u tell from bijus prep is it available also I cant afford paid classes online plz help me plz sir

[mishtalking]

i find question no. 4 answer wrong when a teacher beats a kid with a metallic ruller it will cause harm to the kid and thats offence

[sangrampol]

I didn't understood the concept of necessity when teacher hit student it does have intention of hitting students then how could you say it was necessity and not intentions I mean how could you hit someone without intentions of hitting actions does have intentions to harm yes if accidentally get hit then you can say there was no intentions I think answer to the question is wrong of byju's I didn't understood the concept of necessity when teacher hit student it does have intention of hitting students then how could you say it was necessity and not intentions I mean how could you hit someone without intentions of hitting actions does have intentions to harm yes if accidentally get hit then you can say there was no intentions I think answer to the question is wrong of byju's I didn't understood the concept of necessity when teacher hit student it does have intention of hitting students then how could you say it was necessity and not intentions I mean how could you hit someone without intentions of hitting actions does have intentions to harm yes if accidentally get hit then you can say there was no intentions I think answer to the question is wrong of byju's at 12:11