Prime Numbers - Magic Trick!! - Part 2 | Fun Math | Don't Memorise

preview_player
Показать описание


Register on our website to gain access to all videos and quizzes:

Music Credit: Music by 'Ashutosh'

#PrimeNumbers #FunMath #DontMemorise #neet2024 #infinityLearnNEET #neetsyllabus #neet2025
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

👉LIVE Classes
👉Access to Assessments
👉Excellent Content by Experts in Field

InfinityLearn_NEET
Автор

Every prime number > 3 can be expressed as 6n + 1 or 6n - 1. That is because:

6n + 2 = 3 (n+1) which has 3 as a factor, hence it is composite.
6n + 3 = 2 (n+1) which has 2 as a factor, hence it is composite.
6n + 4 = 2 (3n + 2) which has 2 as a factor, hence it is composite.
6n + 5 = 6 (n+1) - 1. In this case, (n + 1) is the new n, so it can be expressed as 6n - 1.
6n + 6 = 6 (n+1) which has 6 as a factor, hence it is composite.

However, not every number in the series 6n + 1 and 6n - 1 is prime. For example, for n = 20, 6n + 1 = 121 (divisible by 11) and 6n - 1 = 119 (divisible by 7 and 17) are not primes.

amoldalmia
Автор

.
.
.
.
Not always!
For eg:
If n = 4, (6n + 1) = [6(4) + 1] = 25 —> Not Prime
If n = 6, (6n - 1) = [6(6) - 1] = 35 —> Not Prime
Do let us know more such numbers…

InfinityLearn_NEET
Автор

1:01 something that needs to be cleared is he said if the number is a prime these functions are applicable but that doesn't mean here n can be any number...

wiiziples
Автор

Amazing work you guys are doing
Thank you so much
Huge respect to you guys
It helped me a lot

Daudkhan
Автор

Nice explanation with proof one thing if you add in it. It will be applicable for only prime numbers only. Ie greater then 3 and less then 25.

satishkumarsingh
Автор

(6n+1) >3 is not always prime number because
6n+1
Were we can substitute 8 in the term n
So we get 6*8+1
That is
48+1
So it is 49
It in not prime number
Similarly for 6n-1 also

adithyar
Автор

why did you square and subtract 1? what does it prove?

shubhnandu
Автор

What is the proof that a prime grater than 3 can be written as either 6n+1 or 6n-1?

SuperMtheory
Автор

No in the case of 4 as n because when we take n=4, 6n+1= (6*4)+1= 25 which is not a prime number.

utkarshgaurav
Автор

Neet playlist and new neet videos can you make sir

sonytv
Автор

what about 91??
91 is not a prime number. But 91^2-1=8280 is divisible by 24.

PRIYAK-cu
Автор

527 = 6*88 - 1, but it is not prime number..it is divisible but 17 and 31
Similarly 391 is not prime number

castle
Автор

It is failed for number 527.
527 is not prime number.
But it follows (a^2-1)/24

nikhilsevakula
Автор

For a laymen, Euclid's lemma proof of the same is more understandable.

sujatasharma
Автор

No, if we take n=4 then 6(4)+1=25 which is not a prime number

prasoon
Автор

who can answer this ..five triplet of prime numbers such that the sum of the first two is the third

sorokaibamprempremchandra
Автор

No it's not 🚫.if n=4, (6n+1)= 25, which is not a prime no.

quark
Автор

But, why isnt converse true? Is there any proof of it?

gorikasinghal
Автор

No
6* 4 = 24 + 1 =25
Which is not primw

SunilSingh-rsdq