What is lawful money and Legal Tender?

The Federal Reserve Note is a private instrument created from private contract to be used by parties and subjects of those contracts.

United States Constitution doesn't stipulate "lawful money" because it will be another form of slavery which its intent was to abolish inn the first instance!! No one can be bound to only spend one specific type of monies.

In fact, not even once did the United States Constitution use the term "lawful money". Did you know that?

It leaves the slate blank and open to engagement of contract, hence the immediate clause regarding rights and obligation of contract within that same Article 1 Section 10. That term “lawful money” is per Federal Reserve Act.

Default status of the United States is a debtor per Article VI of United States Constitution, and its preceding treaties as it pertains to commerce at North America. But bear in mind, without debt, commerce will never exist. Debt is synonyms with trust, for someone to front you assets, they must trust you, so ultimately there was a preexisting trust relationship. The questions ought to be focused on is: “Who played which position within the trust relationship?”

Debt and trust has always intertwined with one another. It has been that way since time immemorial, so don’t be delusional about what United States is and whether it renders them powerless under appearance of them being ‘bankrupt’ or being a ‘debtor’. In fact there are different types of bankruptcy and if used properly, some bankruptcy flip the script and puts you in superior position.

People ramble on to eternity about “bankruptcy” of the United States but fail to put into account that there are MANY types of bankruptcies, including the ones not available to the general public, where the more “debt’ an organization has, the better and wealthier it becomes. A similitude of it is shown in the system of debt slavery, those who don’t know how to use it suffer, and run in a circle being upset.

Said debt association who is a signatory to Federal Reserve Act that created Federal Reserve Banking systems, engaged in their own private contract to regulate their own debt after certain treaties and permissions. Whether the everyday man choose to be party to that contract by way of implication – use of FRN, a private instrument-, is that man or woman’s issue.

Therefore, when you use someone's monies based on their terms and conditions of contract, you will be taxed. It is that simple.

Are there methods to balance the books? Yes there are, and such remedies are given within other subsequent laws of United States. 90% of people doing promissory notes don’t read those laws and couldn’t care any less to do so.

Now we have thousands of people creating “promissory notes’ under presumption that there is no money. That, this same debtor who has no money is obligated to give some gold or silver as a limited form of satisfaction.

What clouds the whole approach is misconception of what “lawful money” is, and that it is strictly gold or silver. This could be true, if the contract is agreed to bilaterally, and if there aren’t predominant contracts that supersedes yours. Ask yourself, is your contract in harmony with positive law?

Even worse, the presumptions of capacity to state these claims and to contract with the United States is null ab initio. Not to mention, where federal reserve routing numbers are used, this then becomes fraudulent- material fraud.

No issue exist with intent of freedom, but don’t mix and match.

Focus more on group economics with the application of specific laws, and comprehension of positive laws, rather than running in a circle chasing your tail.