Solving GraphQL Errors: Understanding the Cannot return null for non-nullable field Issue

Learn how to fix the `Cannot return null for non-nullable field` error in your GraphQL API by following this step-by-step guide. You'll find explanations, code examples, and tips for improving your Apollo Server set up.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: FakeData "Error: Cannot return null for non-nullable field"

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving GraphQL Errors: Understanding the Cannot return null for non-nullable field Issue

If you're developing with Apollo Server and GraphQL, you might encounter the frustrating error message: Error: Cannot return null for non-nullable field. This issue often arises when you're trying to add new data (like tasks) to a list but your mutation isn't returning the expected output. In this guide, we’ll dive into the details of this error, examine potential causes, and explore effective solutions.

The Problem

You might find yourself trying to add a new task to an existing list in your GraphQL server. Based on your input data structure, everything seems fine at first glance. Here’s a quick look at the code causing the issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup, you're trying to implement the addTask mutation. However, upon executing this mutation in the GraphQL Playground, you receive the error that tasks are null. Let's break down the solution step-by-step.

Understanding the Error

The root of the problem lies in your addTask resolver function. This is what you had:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What’s Going Wrong?

Array vs Object: newTask is being returned as an array because you used .map(). In GraphQL, since addTask is expected to return a single Task object, returning an array leads to the error.

Undefined Values: When GraphQL attempts to resolve a non-nullable field, it finds that the value it has received is undefined due to the array structure, which then converts to null.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, you need to ensure the addTask function correctly returns an object representing the new task instead of an array. Here’s an updated approach:

Updated Code

Using forEach or find, you can streamline the addition of a task to a list:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes Made:

Using .find(): This method allows you to locate a specific list based on the listId, returning the first matching element or undefined if none exist.

Error Handling: If there’s no list found, an error is thrown to alert you immediately, preventing further issues.

Pushing New Task: The new task is added directly to the found list's tasks, avoiding unnecessary creation of an array.

Extra Credit: Code Efficiency

Using .find() is generally more efficient than .map() or .forEach() because it stops searching as soon as it finds a match. This reduces computation time, particularly when working with larger datasets.

Final Thoughts

By understanding the structure needed for your mutation to return a Task object, you can avoid the common pitfall of returning an array in a situation where a single value is expected. Ensure your GraphQL mutations and their corresponding resolvers are designed to return values that strictly conform to the defined type from your schema.

Happy coding, and may your API run smoothly without the null ghost haunting your resolvers!