Religious Language (part one) OCR Religious Studies Lockdown Special!

This video goes through the 20th Century Religious Language views of Verification, Falsification and Language Games. Don't forget to check out the blog: I Think Therefore I Teach for more help or comment underneath if you have any questions :)

[ctrf-wg]

Hiya i’ve got my philosophy exam on the 12th and ur videos are SO AMAZING! You are so brilliant at thoroughly explaining these concepts and you make even the dullest topics fascinating! Thank u so much ❤

[caitrionadurack]

Depending on the essay question is it okay to talk about only two different approaches. For example, say there’s an essay question on the effectiveness of verificationism could I do the strengths and weaknesses of verificationism and then lastly offer falsification as a better approach and that be a good enough plan to get an A*. Or should I talk about more then 2 approaches if I’m aiming for those higher grades? Love your vids btw!!

[cheeks]

if i had a question on Aj Ayer, do i only talk about this topic and leave out via positiva/via negativa etc

[tobiadesina]

If there is a 20th century religious language question can I write on paragraph on classic religious language

[loishart]

Hi! Just wanted to ask about the chess example in Wittgenstein's section, as sometimes people use the metaphor of a game of chess, for example 'you were a pawn in his game of chess'. Obviously its not actually what happened but its not necessarily nonsense like Wittgenstein said? Is he saying that metaphors are also nonsense? Thanks love your videos they help soooo much with my revision!! :)

[V.Vision]

hi, what are the differences between flew and hare?

[eviebeeswax]

What did the C grade girl end up getting?