Understanding the Memory Allocation Differences Between Interface and Class Objects in Java

Explore how Java handles `memory allocation` for class and interface objects, along with essential differences and understanding of references.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Difference between Interface and Class object memory allocation

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Memory Allocation Differences Between Interface and Class Objects in Java

In the world of Java programming, one common area of confusion regards the memory allocation of objects when dealing with interfaces and classes. This problem often plagues developers who are trying to clarify how different types of references affect memory usage and access to methods. Today, we will tackle this topic by breaking down an example involving an interface and a class.

The Setup

Let’s consider the following scenario: we have an interface named A and a class named B that implements this interface.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup, the class B includes an integer field called justAField, a method hello() that implements the interface method, and an additional method called anotherMethod(). Next, we'll see how we can create objects of these types with the following code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Question

The crucial question here revolves around memory allocation between the two objects. Specifically, since one object is referenced by an interface type (typeInterface) and the other by a class type (typeClass), will they consume the same amount of memory? Moreover, does the typeInterface object consume less memory simply because it refers to an interface?

The Key Insight

The short answer to whether typeInterface and typeClass allocate the same amount of memory is yes—both reference the same object of type B, and thus share the same memory usage size. However, there are important distinctions to be made regarding how you can interact with these references.

Reference vs. Object

Object Creation: Both typeInterface and typeClass point to a single object of type B in memory. Therefore, the memory allocated for the object itself is the same, regardless of how you reference it.

Access to Methods and Fields:

When you use the reference typeInterface, you can only call the methods defined in the interface A, which in this case is just hello(). The additional methods and fields of class B, like anotherMethod() or justAField, are not accessible without casting.

If you need to access anotherMethod(), you would have to cast typeInterface back to type B, like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This casting will allow you to access the methods exclusive to class B.

Summary

In summary, while both object references point to the same instance in memory, the way you access the methods available will differ based on whether you're referencing the class (B) or the interface (A). Remember that:

Memory Usage: Both references (typeInterface and typeClass) allocate the same amount of memory for the object itself.

Access Restrictions: The reference type restricts access to methods according to the capabilities defined by the interface.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences in memory allocation and access rights when using interfaces versus classes is essential for efficient Java programming. By recognizing that references determine what you can access—not the amount of memory consumed—you can make better design choices in your applications.

By paying attention to the details of memory allocation in Java, you can utilize interfaces effectively while also maintaining your object-oriented practices. Happy coding!